MA-Suffolk: Warren +22/25/24

[MT Treasurer]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

[Calthrina950]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

[Co-Chair Bagel23]

Please stop polling MA, and get us some polls from MT, ND, IN, MN special (never hurts to have a poll or two in the records just to remove any doubt), NM, etc.

[ON Progressive]

Please stop polling MA, and get us some polls from MT, ND, IN, MN special (never hurts to have a poll or two in the records just to remove any doubt), NM, etc.

This. Why on earth do we literally have zero public polls of Montana and multiple public polls of MA and NY?

[IceSpear]

Please stop polling MA, and get us some polls from MT, ND, IN, MN special (never hurts to have a poll or two in the records just to remove any doubt), NM, etc.

This. Why on earth do we literally have zero public polls of Montana and multiple public polls of MA and NY?

Because MA and NY are coastal elitist states.

[MT Treasurer]

This. Why on earth do we literally have zero public polls of Montana and multiple public polls of MA and NY?

People would start rioting if a pollster even hinted at the fact that Tester won’t be the only candidate on the ballot.

[GMantis]

#WarrenUnder60

[Politician]

Please stop polling MA, and get us some polls from MT, ND, IN, MN special (never hurts to have a poll or two in the records just to remove any doubt), NM, etc.

This. Why on earth do we literally have zero public polls of Montana and multiple public polls of MA and NY?

Why do we have more NY polls than we do Montana polls?

Probably because Sienauffolk is based in New York Massachusetts, and polling just adds more red ink for failing news media companies.

[Strudelcutie4427]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

[Politician]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

You don't realize how liberal Massachusetts is, right? 58 would be 5 points more than what she got against Brown. She'll win by at least 60.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Go Warren.

[Calthrina950]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

That wouldn't be surprising to me (given how divisive Warren is), but Massachusetts is still a Democratic state, so it's possible. Do you think Baker will crack 60%?

[Strudelcutie4427]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

That wouldn't be surprising to me (given how divisive Warren is), but Massachusetts is still a Democratic state, so it's possible. Do you think Baker will crack 60%?

Baker yes, there’ll be a good amount of democrats crossing over to vote for him. He could hit 65. Warren will have zero cross over appeal and will probably lose several south shore and central towns

[Holy Unifying Centrist]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

That wouldn't be surprising to me (given how divisive Warren is), but Massachusetts is still a Democratic state, so it's possible. Do you think Baker will crack 60%?

Baker yes, there’ll be a good amount of democrats crossing over to vote for him. He could hit 65. Warren will have zero cross over appeal and will probably lose several south shore and central towns

MA is 20% republican, so she doesn't need any crossover appeal at all to hit 60 lmao. Do you even understand what you're talking about when you post, or do you just puke out any thought that comes to mind?

Kerry, Obama, & Hillary all got 60% in MA, and Al Gore got 59.80%. They all got basically 0 GOP crossover (besides Obama 08). Also Bill Clinton got 61% in MA. Why would Warren, in a year where educated whites are energized to vote for dems, do worse than any of these other dem vs a no-name republican sacrifice?

[ON Progressive]

Baker yes, there’ll be a good amount of democrats crossing over to vote for him. He could hit 65. Warren will have zero cross over appeal and will probably lose several south shore and central towns

Do you not realize she got nearly 54% of the vote in 2012 while running against an incumbent Senator with 60% approval? I would be shocked if she didn't get 60%, considering both the environment of 2018 and considering her opponents are nowhere near as strong as Scott Brown.

[henster]

If Warren can't crack 60 then she's probably not electable in 2020.

[Classic Conservative]

Warren will probably get around 62 or so. She’s very popular amongst the base of her party, but a lot of presidential swing voters in Massachusetts don’t like her. I know around five people that voted for Hillary, but despise her.

[Calthrina950]

55% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
33% Geoff Diehl (R)

56% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
31% Beth Lindstrom (R)

54% Elizabeth Warren (D, inc.)
30% John Kingston (R)

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/77340.php#.WyRn_SAyXIV

How many voters are undecided? And will Warren break 60%?

She wont hit 60. shes pretty reviled on the South Shore, Center, and Northeast of the state. I think 57-58 is her ceiling

That wouldn't be surprising to me (given how divisive Warren is), but Massachusetts is still a Democratic state, so it's possible. Do you think Baker will crack 60%?

Baker yes, there’ll be a good amount of democrats crossing over to vote for him. He could hit 65. Warren will have zero cross over appeal and will probably lose several south shore and central towns

It will be interesting to see what happens. Given the political environment of 2018 and Massachusetts's Democratic lean, I still think that Warren will break 60%, but I can't imagine her doing much better than Hillary Clinton, and it would be something if she does end up underperforming Baker. I don't particularly like Warren that much myself, but I see no problem with Baker. If I were a Massachusetts voter, I would probably be voting Republican in the gubernatorial race and for a third-party candidate in the Senate race.

[fluffypanther19]

If Warren can't crack 60 then she's probably not electable in 2020.

[Progressive Pessimist]

If Warren can't crack 60 then she's probably not electable in 2020.

I like Warren and her Senate race here is safe. But I wish I could say that this didn't worry me about Warren being a Presidential nominee.