PA (Franklin & Marshall): Casey +17 (user search)

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 31, 2023, 01:20:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  PA (Franklin & Marshall): Casey +17 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA (Franklin & Marshall): Casey +17  (Read 1981 times)
MT Treasurer (Daines's Brain)
Atlas Icon
Posts: 14,512
United States

« on: June 14, 2018, 08:52:17 PM »

Anyway, remember when the real battlegrounds would be in the Obama/Trump states, as they would decide whether or not the GOP got a filibuster proof majority? lol

Not really, no. MT has been considered Lean/Likely D ever since Zinke (lol) and Fox declined to run, and I donít recall anyone predicting that Manchin couldnít possibly win reelection. Itís true that most people underestimated Brown, Donnelly, and McCaskill, but letís not act as if Republicans or pundits were confidently predicting a GOP filibuster proof majority at any point. My initial Senate ratings were too R-friendly, but even I never bought Heitkamp being DOA because of polarization or Native Americans or whatever ridiculous argument people will come up with to "prove" that sheís vulnerable even in a massive D wave year.

Yeah, I remember when people were predicting a filibuster-proof majority with Sen. Mandel, Sen. Rock, Sen. Duffy, and Sen. LePage.

I donít. Rating those states Tossups or saying that they could become competitive under the right circumstances ≠ predicting that they will flip. I might be wrong, but I donít recall many people rating ME, MI, and WI Tossups, even in 2016 and 2017. With the benefit of hindsight, itís always easy to mock Republicans for making overconfident predictions, but even many Democrats on this site underestimated how pronounced the enthusiasm gap and how Democratic-leaning this election cycle in general would be (in part because most of us gave way too much weight to factors like the state of the economy and foreign policy issues). If you think itís only Republicans who are being "delusional" or "overconfident", you donít seem to remember 2014 and 2016 very well. Itís probably more accurate to say that many people have some sort of recency bias, underestimating how rapidly the political environment can change in a year or less. When Republicans lose badly this fall, Iím sure many Democrats and pundits will predict a D wave year in 2020 or 2022 (even under a Democratic president) and declare the GOP dead. These things happen after every election.

I remember when some Very Serious PeopleTM thought Debbie Stabenow was going to lose to Kid Rock and OH-Sen was Lean R.

One or two posters ≠ "people".
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  

Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.