Special Election CA-48
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:11:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Special Election CA-48
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Special Election CA-48  (Read 1261 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 04, 2005, 10:33:48 PM »

For the Californians on this site.

As if anyone really cares.  Tongue 

This is Chris Cox's former seat.  Orange County, CA, really Newport Beach.

Turnout, from reports I have, was extremely light.

You can follow the results here, if you want to:

http://www.oc.ca.gov/election/Live/e26/results.htm

If one candidate gets over 50% of the vote, there will be no runoff.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2005, 10:36:28 PM »

There is some interest because of Gilchrist's candidacy.

If no one gets 50% +1, by the way, any qualifying party's top candidate makes the runoff. So no matter how many votes they get, the Green, Libertarian, and American Independent parties would all participate, as well of course as the GOP and DNC.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2005, 12:39:22 AM »

Gilchrist is in 3rd right now, behind 2 Republicans, and he's gaining ground on Brewer (endorsed by McCain and various moderate GOP elements). He's got a decent lead over the leading Democrat, who is in 4th.

Looks like Gilchrist did the worst among absentee voters... in part perhaps because he's gained some momentum of late. Campbell appears unlikely to get 50%.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2005, 12:55:29 AM »

Hey, it's got the city that almost banned water, Aliso Viejo. Needless to say, the people in this district aren't that smart.
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2005, 01:02:57 AM »

  Orange County
48th Congressional District Primary Election
October 4, 2005, 10:46 PM

Unofficial Results for Election

Registration and Turnout
Completed Precincts: 268 of 268
   Reg/Turnout    Percentage
Total Registered Voters    402006    
Precinct Registration    402006    
Precinct Ballots Cast    31959    7.9%
Early Ballots Cast    962    0.2%
Absentee Ballots Cast    47440    11.8%
Total Ballots Cast    80361    20.0%

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 48th District
   Vote Count    Percentage
JOHN CAMPBELL (REP)    36640    46.0%
MARILYN C. BREWER (REP)    13272    16.7%
JIM GILCHRIST (AI)    11490    14.4%
STEVE YOUNG (DEM)    7110    8.9%
JOHN GRAHAM (DEM)    3242    4.1%
BEA FOSTER (DEM)    2606    3.3%
DON UDALL (REP)    1284    1.6%
JOHN KELLY (REP)    955    1.2%
BÉA TIRITILLI (GRN)    698    0.9%
BRUCE COHEN (LIB)    667    0.8%
DAVID R. CROUCH (REP)    455    0.6%
SCOTT MACCABE (REP)    353    0.4%
MARSHA A. MORRIS (REP)    322    0.4%
TOM PALLOW (DEM)    270    0.3%
GUY E. MAILLY (REP)    138    0.2%
MARSHALL SAMUEL SANDERS (REP)    94    0.1%
EDWARD A. SUPPE (REP)    87    0.1%

Looks like another election.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2005, 01:08:15 AM »

Gilchrist finished in 3rd, with 14.4%, more than the top 2 Democrats combined. My rough math indicates he got over 20% of those that voted today as opposed to absentee. The 2nd place finisher, Republican Marilyn Brewer, got more votes than all Democrats combined.

Campbell finished with 46% after getting ~52% of absentees; those ballots however numbered over half the total. His election day performance was around 40%.

The runoff will be:

GOP: Campbell- 46%
AIP: Gilchrist- 14.4%
DNC: Young- 8.9%
GRN: Tiritilli- .9%
LP: Cohen- .8%

Campbell is the overwhelming favorite. There is the potential for a 3-way race if Gilchrist gets an infusion of funds, though neither he nor Young stands a serious chance of winning. Gilchrist should at least be able to put some fear into Campbell.
Logged
socaldem
skolodji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2005, 04:25:57 AM »

Gilchrist is in 3rd right now, behind 2 Republicans, and he's gaining ground on Brewer (endorsed by McCain and various moderate GOP elements). He's got a decent lead over the leading Democrat, who is in 4th.

Looks like Gilchrist did the worst among absentee voters... in part perhaps because he's gained some momentum of late. Campbell appears unlikely to get 50%.

Does the abject failure of the McCain-endorsed candidate say anything about McCain's chances with the rank and file in a Presidential primary in 2008?

If anything, though, it seems McCain has burned some bridges with the O.C. gop establishment because they worked very hard for Campbell and chastized--and even censured--Brewer.  I suppose that donor base might drift to Rudy or Allen....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 12 queries.