|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2020, 10:24:47 AM
News: 2020 Election day live thread: https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=409870.0

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  Missouri-Gravis Marketing Hawley Leads 50-43 in Peterson (R) Internal
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Missouri-Gravis Marketing Hawley Leads 50-43 in Peterson (R) Internal  (Read 3077 times)
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 22, 2018, 10:34:16 PM »

Missouri
Senate

Hawley (R) 50%
McCaskill (D) 43%

Peterson (R) 56%
McCaskill (D) 40%

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/politics/elections/2018/05/22/missouri-gop-senate-candidate-touts-polling-republican-josh-hawley-against-sen-claire-mccaskill/633366002/
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2018, 10:39:01 PM »

“Peterson internal”
Logged
krazen1211
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2018, 11:26:35 PM »
« Edited: May 23, 2018, 08:59:02 AM by Brittain33 »

This polls shows encouraging results for Petersen. As a Republican, I am happy.
Logged
Ses
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,454



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2018, 11:27:53 PM »

Well Austin, you tried.
Logged
Pollster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2018, 11:42:08 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The quality of the poll is evident from the price tag.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,893
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2018, 12:01:43 AM »


This without a doubt! (Do I really have to /s?)
Logged
Lincoln Speaker Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: 0.87

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2018, 12:08:39 AM »

The Hawley numbers are somewhat believable, but sorry Petersen, you would not Blanche McCaskill. LOL.
Logged
President Biden
Politician
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,046
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -4.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2018, 06:19:24 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The quality of the poll is evident from the price tag.
Logged
President Biden
Politician
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,046
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -4.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2018, 06:19:52 AM »

The Hawley numbers are somewhat believable, but sorry Petersen, you would not Blanche McCaskill. LOL.
If the poll showed McCaskill up by double digits you'd say "OH it can't be true McCaskill will get blanched"
Logged
scutosaurus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,904
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -6.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2018, 08:05:46 AM »

Logged
cvparty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,991
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2018, 09:13:41 AM »

oMg SAFe R
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,832
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2018, 09:33:35 AM »

Junk poll, like almost all internals.
Logged
TheRocketRaccoon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 761
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2018, 10:27:00 AM »

The Hawley numbers are somewhat believable, but sorry Petersen, you would not Blanche McCaskill. LOL.
If the poll showed McCaskill up by double digits you'd say "OH it can't be true McCaskill will get blanched"
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Moderators
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,144
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2018, 10:44:40 AM »

Logged
CityofSinners
Rookie
**
Posts: 48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 23, 2018, 10:53:19 AM »

Logged
Skunk
hynza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,865
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -9.48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2018, 12:00:18 PM »

Probably tapped into all the undecided furries. Wink
Logged
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,427
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2018, 12:03:00 PM »

Why hasn't mds32 been stripped of database entry? Disgusting that this poll was entered. We're supposed to be better than (R)CP.
Logged
UncleSam
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,742
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2018, 12:07:18 PM »

Gravis is roughly as bad a pollster as PPP (as much as Atlas denied that fact), but that’s not even the worst thing about this poll. The worst thing about this poll is the release bias. Who knows how many surveys Peterson commissioned at 2k a crack before getting something he wanted to release. I would assume that this poll is at least two standard deviations above the mean.
Logged
Pollster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 23, 2018, 12:09:18 PM »

Looking more closely at this: it was conducted in one (1) day yet has a sample size that would normally take 3-4 days under Gravis' methodology. My guess is this is a much smaller sample (probably somewhere between 180-200) heavily weighted to appear larger. This is not uncommon for internal polling conducted solely to generate fundraising/media.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2018, 12:11:00 PM »

Gravis is roughly as bad a pollster as PPP (as much as Atlas denied that fact), but that’s not even the worst thing about this poll. The worst thing about this poll is the release bias. Who knows how many surveys Peterson commissioned at 2k a crack before getting something he wanted to release. I would assume that this poll is at least two standard deviations above the mean.

You know you may be onto something
Logged
brand_allen
Rookie
**
Posts: 57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 25, 2018, 03:36:09 PM »

So apparently Gravis has released extra information from this poll a couple of days after it's initial release.

They peg Trump's job approval rating...in Missouri...at near 70% (68/31%).

They peg scandal-ridden governor Eric Greitens with a positive 55/39% job approval rating.

Again, this from the same pollster that found Trump with a higher fav rating in California (47/51%) than in Indiana (44/51%).
Logged
brand_allen
Rookie
**
Posts: 57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 25, 2018, 03:36:36 PM »

Here's the link (since I can finally post them): https://www.austinpetersen.com/gravis_poll
Logged
Pollster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 25, 2018, 04:22:38 PM »

They peg Trump's job approval rating...in Missouri...at near 70% (68/31%).

Obviously this poll is a methodological disaster and therefore useless, but to put this in perspective: they have McCaskill trailing Hawley by single digits among a sample where Trump is +37.
Logged
brand_allen
Rookie
**
Posts: 57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 25, 2018, 06:20:59 PM »

They peg Trump's job approval rating...in Missouri...at near 70% (68/31%).

Obviously this poll is a methodological disaster and therefore useless, but to put this in perspective: they have McCaskill trailing Hawley by single digits among a sample where Trump is +37.

Gov. Greitens job approval rating in polling conducted this year:

Morning Consult, 1/1-3/31, 40/39%, Net: +1
Mason Dixon, 4/4-5, 41/47%, Net: -6
TJP Strategies, 4/19-20, 37/51%, Net: -14
Emerson College, 4/26-29, 33/46%, Net: -13
TJP Strategies, 5/9-10, 34/53%, Net: -19

Gravis Marketing: 5/16-16, 55/39%, Net: +16

Which one of these is not like the other ones? Plus, the news surrounding the scandal has worsened for him, not improved. Really, I'm surprised Gravis even released these numbers. They've had some questionable survey results over the years, but the last few polls they've put out have been preposterous. This sort of stuff causes legit reputational damage.
Logged
Lach
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,287
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 25, 2018, 07:32:16 PM »

Ok, can we have this poll removed from the average and strip mds of the ability to input polling data?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.