IN-SEN Gravis: Braun +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 12:49:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  IN-SEN Gravis: Braun +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IN-SEN Gravis: Braun +1  (Read 8423 times)
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« on: May 17, 2018, 11:01:16 AM »

Tossup before primary, Tossup after. Not a good poll for Donnelly, but also not a super great poll for Braun. This one will be close.

Some of the crosstabs were interesting.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2018, 11:10:33 AM »

Anyone remember that Gravis poll from April 11 that had Joe up by 10? Good times.

Those were both of the other Republican opponents Rotika and Messer. Braun stayed out of the fray and rightfully has a positive impression as well.

Donnelly's Approval rating meanwhile has slipped.
Change in Gravis Polls:
April - 47/32 Approval
May - 41/40 Approval
What has Donnelly done in the past month to warrant a 14-point swing in approval?

Gravis is a crappy pollster. It's as simple as that.

I don't see CNN or CBS polling there right now. We have to take what we can get.


I mean, yeah, this. And Indiana has really strict rules around polling so this may be all we get for a while

Also:

I take this poll with a grain of salt, but I do think Donnelly is the most vulnerable incumbent this cycle.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2018, 12:08:25 PM »

Anyone remember that Gravis poll from April 11 that had Joe up by 10? Good times.

Those were both of the other Republican opponents Rotika and Messer. Braun stayed out of the fray and rightfully has a positive impression as well.

Donnelly's Approval rating meanwhile has slipped.
Change in Gravis Polls:
April - 47/32 Approval
May - 41/40 Approval
What has Donnelly done in the past month to warrant a 14-point swing in approval?

Gravis is a crappy pollster. It's as simple as that.

According to this forum, who isn’t a crappy pollster?

PPP, CNN, YouGov, Marist, Siena, Monmouth, Quinnipiac, Trafalgar, Fox.

This is probably one of the funniest things about Atlas, they actually think Fox is decent for polling, but hate them for everything else

Well, Fox’s polling operation is solid. It’s worth distinguishing from the rest of the network
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2018, 12:50:13 PM »

Gosh, I just want to point out that these crosstabs are so funky, and the entire poll seems weird. Almost every single one has at least a few things that seem really weird.

Well, it IS a Gravis Poll, and unfortunately he only data point available
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2018, 03:59:51 PM »

Anyone remember that Gravis poll from April 11 that had Joe up by 10? Good times.

Those were both of the other Republican opponents Rotika and Messer. Braun stayed out of the fray and rightfully has a positive impression as well.

Donnelly's Approval rating meanwhile has slipped.
Change in Gravis Polls:
April - 47/32 Approval
May - 41/40 Approval
What has Donnelly done in the past month to warrant a 14-point swing in approval?

Gravis is a crappy pollster. It's as simple as that.

According to this forum, who isn’t a crappy pollster?

PPP, CNN, YouGov, Marist, Siena, Monmouth, Quinnipiac, Trafalgar, Fox.

But muh Faux News

As I said earlier, Fox’s polling is pretty good. It can and should be distinguished from the remainder of the organization, especially its evening opinion programming
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.