TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50% (user search)

UWS
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,241

Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%

« on: April 27, 2018, 12:38:13 PM »

Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Logged

UWS
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,241

Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%

« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2018, 01:08:21 PM »

Quote from: Bagel23 on April 27, 2018, 12:40:47 PM

Quote from: UWS on April 27, 2018, 12:38:13 PM

Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Phil Bredesen may very well lose, but he is not a coward and DC lackey like Bayh, not equal.

I mean they both led in polls in red states for months and Bayh went on to lose by 10 points, which means Bredesen’s current advantage doesn’t guarantee him victory.

Logged

UWS
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,241

Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%

« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2018, 11:52:13 AM »

Quote from: Bagel23 on April 28, 2018, 11:34:23 AM

Quote from: IceSpear on April 28, 2018, 12:36:55 AM

Quote from: Doctor Imperialism on April 27, 2018, 01:34:55 PM

But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! Sad

The Ohio Senate race was competitive in April 2016, lol. Hell, it was competitive as late as August!

Bredesen would probably win if the election were held today, but it won't be. There's nowhere for him to go but down. Will he go down enough for Blackburn to win? That's basically what people are arguing about.

Was not competitive in August, it was pretty obvious Portman ran away with it by mid to late June.

The same for Todd Young in Indiana in the summer of 2016.

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 28, 2024, 11:15:58 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more