Is Chicago leaving Illinois?
Logically, if Texas and Georgia are Democratic states, the entire rust belt must be solid R because otherwise the map would always strongly favor Democrats depending on the swing states.
I think we are likely headed for a dominant-party system where Democrats have an inbuilt advantage in presidential elections.
Hence, IL and MN are still Dem, and the rust belt is simply swingy like it has long been.
The GOP got its spell as a party with an inbuilt advantage - look at the period between 1968 and 1988.
Why wouldn't the Democrats get a similar opportunity? What goes around comes around.
Agreed. Republicans don't seem to have a great path to 270 once the sun belt becomes a little more Democratic.
They'll have their wilderness years, but I'm sure some candidate will be able to figure out a new direction for the party, a la Clinton in '92