Make an election map between you and the last two posters.

[Vice President Christian Man]

Ferguson 97 (D-NJ)/Michelle Grisham (D-NM): 332 E.V./51.3%
Greg The Great (R-NY)/Josh Hawley (R-MO): 206 E.V./47.2%

Despite being a strong candidate and winning areas thought to have previously be unwinnable, Greg The Great defeats Ferguson 97, who chooses Michelle Grisham to appeal to Hispanic/Latinos. His plan worked and they ended up winning, as The Sun Belt revolted against Greg The Great's genius populist platform of bringing back manufacturing and mining jobs, as well as supporting breaking up big tech/big business and ending the endless overseas war, along with traditional stances on social issues.

Closest state (Ferguson '97): Maine at. lg: .16%
Greg The Great: South Carolina 1.18%

Homestate Stats:
New York, homestate of Grge The Great: 59-36 Ferguson
New Jersey, homestate of Ferguson '97: 60-37 Ferguson
New Mexico, homestate of Michelle Grisham: 51-46 Ferguson
Missouri, homestate of Josh Hawley: 64/34 Greg

Ferguson 97's slogan: Greg's Not Great
Greg The Great's slogan: Build back manufacturing better.

[Vice President Christian Man]

I'd have to run as a left-wing nationalist in this case, deemphasizing my views on most cultural issues. DPK Debator gets about 3-4% of the P.V. and is enough to flip some states in both directions, while GTG's temporary moratorium on immigration significantly harms him with Latino voters.

[Vice President Christian Man]

With only subtle differences on economics, it turned into an election purely based on social issues and foreign policy. Scott gained the SE due to regional appeal, while I did well in the Midwest because of my running mate's appeal. Anarcho Statism ran as a protest candidate having lost to Scott in the primary but developed a strong following that cost Scott 3 states and initially the E.C.


Scott ended up winning thanks to the House.