2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 29, 2024, 08:41:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 76
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread v2  (Read 174176 times)
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,066
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1350 on: September 02, 2018, 10:32:27 AM »

Don’t understand the change in TX-23. Others make sense except that WA-03 should be Lean R, but I guess they’re intentionally being slow at upgrading it because they had it at Solid R for so long.
Will Hurd is up in his internals.

If his internals are really so good, why doesn't he release them? That is the thing that makes me skeptical of claims from Republicans that they will win races like TX-23 and PA-01. What incentive do they have not to show how well they are doing there, in the few places where (allegedly) they could counter the narrative being driven by all the Dem internals?
^
This exactly. I've been hearing all the time how strong these guys are, but there is no real proof to support that. If PA01 and TX23 are so good for the Rs, why no polling?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1351 on: September 02, 2018, 10:52:42 AM »

If pundits are going to move races based off "internals", why is NC-07 still safe R?
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,399


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1352 on: September 02, 2018, 11:12:02 AM »

On TX-23:

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,207
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1353 on: September 02, 2018, 11:29:28 AM »

If pundits are going to move races based off "internals", why is NC-07 still safe R?

Because Hurd is an Unbeatable Moderate Titan like Comstock.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,066
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1354 on: September 02, 2018, 05:55:14 PM »

On TX-23:


So basically this is all based on assumptions and not data. Great.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,278


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1355 on: September 02, 2018, 06:09:41 PM »

Will Hurd is not Lean R, the seat is Lean D, if not Likely D.
Logged
Almost Anyone But Biden Or Trump (ABBoT but not Greg Abbott)
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,177


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1356 on: September 02, 2018, 07:45:49 PM »

Will Hurd is not Lean R, the seat is Lean D, if not Likely D.

The only reason I am not sure that is correct is that it is a Hispanic district, and Hispanic midterm turnout is generally horrible. For any other sort of district, with the same PVI, he would be a goner.
Logged
Strong Candidate
123NY
Rookie
**
Posts: 226


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1357 on: September 02, 2018, 08:40:53 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2018, 08:45:38 PM by 123NY »

Will Hurd is not Lean R, the seat is Lean D, if not Likely D.

Internal polling by both sides reportedly shows Hurd ahead, and both local and national reporters (ie. not just Dave Wasserman, but also the reporters at the Texas Tribune), as well as local activists, are considering him to be in no worse, perhaps even outright better, shape than Culberson and Sessions. I'd keep it as Tossup, but still. It's entirely possible Hurd wins and both Sessions and Culberson lose.  Also, when people keep saying "if the internals are so good why don't they release them." they should remember that internals are primarily released to attract donations to a race and argue you're worth investing in, which incumbents in competitive seats don't need to do. Also, not all internal polling is made equal; the internals they're seeing are probably conducted by respected firms and are not total junk like the NC-07/ VA-09/NJ-05 polls. It's also not like all reports of internal polling are GOP spin either; Wasserman went on the record saying that internal polling shows Paulsen, Blum and Lewis behind.
Logged
Roblox
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1358 on: September 02, 2018, 09:32:50 PM »

If pundits are going to move races based off "internals", why is NC-07 still safe R?

You see, they just don't want to reveal the shocking truth: unbeatable moderate titan (TM) Will Hurd is leading with 99.9% of the vote. Meanwhile, the remaining 0.1% is simply undecided as to whether or not they will spend election day organizing the annual $100 million dollar parade in Hurd's honor.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,399


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1359 on: September 03, 2018, 07:05:15 PM »

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1360 on: September 03, 2018, 07:08:16 PM »

Glad to see they're lighting money on fire in a safe D race like AZ-09. As if the GOP is going to win an open seat trending heavily D that Hillary won by 17 points in a year like this. Unfortunately the others look like pretty reasonable choices.
Logged
America needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,798


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1361 on: September 03, 2018, 07:10:26 PM »

Glad to see they're lighting money on fire in a safe D race like AZ-09. As if the GOP is going to win an open seat trending heavily D that Hillary won by 17 points in a year like this. Unfortunately the others look like pretty reasonable choices.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1362 on: September 03, 2018, 07:14:19 PM »

I can't wait to see MT Treasurer's reaction to Republican strategists thinking AZ-09 is more winnable than IA-01, lol.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,359
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1363 on: September 03, 2018, 07:18:42 PM »

NJ-03? That pretty much confirms the impending disaster for NJ Republicans. That's the one I really want to see us win from NJ.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1364 on: September 03, 2018, 08:29:39 PM »

I didn’t know Steve Stivers was an Atlas poster.
Logged
Atlas Force
mlee117379
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1365 on: September 04, 2018, 08:58:20 AM »

Looks like Rothfus has been triaged:

Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1366 on: September 04, 2018, 09:17:28 AM »



LOL @ CA-16, CA-24, and FL-27.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1367 on: September 04, 2018, 02:12:46 PM »



LOL @ CA-16, CA-24, and FL-27.
It appears Mr. Stivers wants to set money on fire in blue districts. Maybe he's paying too much attention to RRH's "ratings".

Also, Carol Miller is almost 70.
Logged
CityofSinners
Rookie
**
Posts: 210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1368 on: September 05, 2018, 06:29:21 AM »

Politico published their first ratings for this year.

https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/house-senate-race-ratings-and-predictions/
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1369 on: September 05, 2018, 06:46:14 AM »

They're a bit less afraid of putting seats as lean/likely compared to other raters (is my impression at a Quick glance at least).
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1370 on: September 05, 2018, 01:34:28 PM »

Those ratings are godawful.  MN-08 more likely to flip than AZ-02 and MN-02? Roll Eyes

And they have MD-06, MA-09, IA-02, MI-05, and NH-02 as only "likely D" while MO-02 is "solid R", LOL. Someone should tell Politico it's not a Republican wave.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1371 on: September 05, 2018, 01:36:41 PM »

Those ratings are godawful.  MN-08 more likely to flip than AZ-02 and MN-02? Roll Eyes

And they have MD-06, MA-09, IA-02, MI-05, and NH-02 as only "likely D" while MO-02 is "solid R", LOL. Someone should tell Politico it's not a Republican wave.
Politico is basically King Lear if he was paid so you shouldn't be surprised. MA-09? MI-05? LMAO.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1372 on: September 05, 2018, 01:38:58 PM »

Jesus, I'm never going to criticize Larry Sabato and Charlie Cook again. Their ratings are like the ten commandment stone slabs compared to this.
Logged
wesmoorenerd
westroopnerd
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,600
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1373 on: September 05, 2018, 02:15:46 PM »

Jesus, I'm never going to criticize Larry Sabato and Charlie Cook again. Their ratings are like the ten commandment stone slabs compared to this.

Sabato and Cook's House ratings are pretty good right now. Early on, their ratings hadn't quite caught up with the wave yet, but everything looks about right overall.

Their gubernatorial and Senate ratings are still trash, though (although Sabato's are definitely the better of the two).
Logged
Almost Anyone But Biden Or Trump (ABBoT but not Greg Abbott)
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,177


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1374 on: September 05, 2018, 03:20:56 PM »

Sabato and Cook's House ratings are pretty good right now. Early on, their ratings hadn't quite caught up with the wave yet, but everything looks about right overall.

Their gubernatorial and Senate ratings are still trash, though (although Sabato's are definitely the better of the two).

Yeah, agreed on all points. Also the 538 model is much better now, though initially it was junk.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 76  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.075 seconds with 12 queries.