MO-Gravis: McCaskill leads narrowly
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 12:34:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-Gravis: McCaskill leads narrowly
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Gravis: McCaskill leads narrowly  (Read 1346 times)
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 12, 2018, 08:06:04 AM »

https://www.scribd.com/document/373614957/2018-Poll-Missouri-March-10-2018

McCaskill (D, i) - 42
Hawley (R) - 40

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Greitens way underwater at 34-50, as well.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,933
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2018, 08:22:24 AM »

WOO!
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2018, 08:27:05 AM »

Those are kind of mediocre numbers for both candidates, honestly.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2018, 08:29:24 AM »

Those are kind of mediocre numbers for both candidates, honestly.

Yes, 42 is pretty horrible for an incumbent. But 40 is also stunningly bad for a candidate who has been campaigning for several months and is reasonably well known.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2018, 08:39:22 AM »

Those are kind of mediocre numbers for both candidates, honestly.

Yes, 42 is pretty horrible for an incumbent. But 40 is also stunningly bad for a candidate who has been campaigning for several months and is reasonably well known.

Precisely my thoughts.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,756


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2018, 11:56:28 AM »

Gravis' sampling method and voter screening is questionable - very strange that they are putting out polls of multiple states with candidates in the low-40's/high-30's despite virtually all other polls of the same races showing much less volatility.

Edit: Just saw that they sample registered voters only. This explains the larger amount of volatility, but their numbers are still overall strangely low.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,578
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2018, 12:23:57 PM »

While the GOP has been doing all it can to try to ruin this should-be-a-gimme pickup, just 42% of the state is willing to back McCaskill. Just goes to show how republican Missouri has become as a result of Obama.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2018, 09:37:42 AM »

What an awful state.

While the GOP has been doing all it can to try to ruin this should-be-a-gimme pickup, just 42% of the state is willing to back McCaskill. Just goes to show how republican Missouri has become as a result of Obama.

Why are you so obsessed with this? You say this in every MO thread, but the state isn’t even more Republican than IN or MT and still willing to elect Democrats down-ballot. Anyway, no matter how you want to spin this, this is a terrible poll for Republicans. I agree with the people who think Indiana is more likely to flip, honestly. McCaskill can fire up the Democratic base without running the risk of alienating a lot of Republicans/suburbanites/swing voters/etc. and Hawley has been way too overhyped.
You are asking why somebody is so obsessed with a state going a certain way? Tongue
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2018, 02:58:04 AM »

Those are kind of mediocre numbers for both candidates, honestly.

Yes, 42 is pretty horrible for an incumbent. But 40 is also stunningly bad for a candidate who has been campaigning for several months and is reasonably well known.

In all fairness he only seriously kicked things off a few days ago, but he is showing that he’s not the boy wonder that Turtleman thought he was. This’ll be close.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 13 queries.