The National Gazette (Coverage of the February 2018 election)

[wxtransit]

What is a vote for Wxtransit?

[Sestak]

What is a vote for Wxtransit?

Fine by me.

[wxtransit]

What is a vote for Wxtransit?

Fine by me.

Darn.

[Trans Rights Are Human Rights]

How about a vote for Peebs?

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Results

1st Ballot 2nd Ballot Fhtagn     49%     58% Pericles     32%     42% Spiral     14%     —% Others     05%     —%

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1		4		1		1		2		0
ALL		FED		LAB		PAX		PUP		OTH
03%		56%		13%		13%		13%		00%

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Results
Regional and Senatorial elections

LINCOLN (Governor)		FREMONT (First Minister)
1st Ballot 2nd Ballot 1184AZ     46%     50% Kingpoleon     46%     50% Others     08%     —%		1st Ballot 2nd Ballot DFL     100%     ✓ Others     00%

LINCOLN (Senate, Class I)		FREMONT (Senate, Class I)
1st Ballot 2nd Ballot N. Madigan     55%     ✓ Cinyc     44%		1st Ballot 2nd Ballot Lumine Von Reuental     69%     ✓ Henry Wallace     31%

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Results

1st Ballot 2nd Ballot Fhtagn     51%     59% Pericles     31%     41% Spiral     13%     —% Others     05%     —%

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1		4		1		1		2		0
ALL		FED		LAB		PAX		PUP		OTH
03%		55%		12%		14%		16%		00%

[diptheriadan]

Kinda shocked at how badly Spiral is performing.

[Sestak]

Fhtagn cruising to reelection, as expected, but perhaps with the federalists losing their house majority.

Also the other story here is that Federalists will return to a 5-seat majority in the Southern Chamber, as Dip gets to appoint weatherboy's replacement.

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Incidentally, this map is starting to look very familiar.

June 2016 presidential election
Leinad (Federalist) 57%
Truman (Labor) 42%
Others (Radical) 1%

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Results

1st Ballot 2nd Ballot Fhtagn     50%     58% Pericles     29%     42% Spiral     17%     —% Others     04%     —%

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

0		4		1		1		2		1		0
ALL		FED		LAB		PAX		PUP		TOSS		OTH
04%		56%		11%		15%		15%		—		00%

[Sestak]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

[thumb21]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

[Sestak]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

[DFL]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

Technically too late for him to drop off the ballot, but that hasn’t stopped people from 1st preffing him lmao

[Terry the Fat Shark]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

Technically too late for him to drop off the ballot, but that hasn’t stopped people from 1st preffing him lmao

They are doing it as a strategic move, if he gets elected and resigns, Yankee gets to appoint his replacement aka a fed, meaning they would keep their majority.

[DFL]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

Technically too late for him to drop off the ballot, but that hasn’t stopped people from 1st preffing him lmao

They are doing it as a strategic move, if he gets elected and resigns, Yankee gets to appoint his replacement aka a fed, meaning they would keep their majority.

No kidding. #hacks

[wxtransit]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

Technically too late for him to drop off the ballot, but that hasn’t stopped people from 1st preffing him lmao

They are doing it as a strategic move, if he gets elected and resigns, Yankee gets to appoint his replacement aka a fed, meaning they would keep their majority.

No kidding. #hacks

It's frankly sad that the Federalist leadership would rather vote for a person who doesn't want to be voted in because of RL health reasons than a Representative that has a 100% activity record, sponsored the second-most bills, and has a plan for his next term, just because of partisan reasons. If you want to prove you really are for a "More Welcoming Atlasia" and you aren't party hacks, I would say it is wise to those who haven't voted yet to consider their vote if they plan to first preference ReaganClinton.

[DFL]

Wait, I thought there were only 9 candidates who didn't drop out.

9 declared candidates and 1 write in candidate.

Didn't RC20XX drop out?

Technically too late for him to drop off the ballot, but that hasn’t stopped people from 1st preffing him lmao

They are doing it as a strategic move, if he gets elected and resigns, Yankee gets to appoint his replacement aka a fed, meaning they would keep their majority.

No kidding. #hacks

It's frankly sad that the Federalist leadership would rather vote for a person who doesn't want to be voted in because of RL health reasons than a Representative that has a 100% activity record, sponsored the second-most bills, and has a plan for his next term, just because of partisan reasons. If you want to prove you really are for a "More Welcoming Atlasia" and you aren't party hacks, I would say it is wise to those who haven't voted yet to consider their vote if they plan to first preference ReaganClinton.

g e t   f l a m e d

[Terry the Fat Shark]

oh please don't go spouting off supposed moral values, you guys have hardly been a beacon of non partisan hope either

> a partisan "non-partisan" party, have you ever seen such a thing?

I am 100% sure if it was reversed, you'd be pushing the alliance person as much as possible

spare us the moral high ground, please.

[Terry the Fat Shark]

also even more ironic is the fact that the federalists literally helped get you elected last time, funny how your house seat seems to make or break on how well you can deal with the federalists

[Oakvale]

I actually didn't vote for RC for the reasons stated, but to be fair it's politics 101 to hold your majority at all costs, including electing a vacant seat in order to appoint a replacement. A competent opposition would - and should - do exactly the same thing.

[P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong]

I find it interesting that Spiral is winning all these Midwestern states

[P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong]

Incidentally, this map is starting to look very familiar.

June 2016 presidential election
Leinad (Federalist) 57%
Truman (Labor) 42%
Others (Radical) 1%

This, too. Crazy how Atlasia has, like, its own political geography despite our small and quickly changing membership

[wxtransit]

oh please don't go spouting off supposed moral values, you guys have hardly been a beacon of non partisan hope either

> a partisan "non-partisan" party, have you ever seen such a thing?

I am 100% sure if it was reversed, you'd be pushing the alliance person as much as possible

spare us the moral high ground, please.

When did I claim the "moral high ground"? That's disingenuous. My post said "don't vote for a person who doesn't want to be voted for". And, to all those who are wondering, I would not be pushing the Alliance person, guarantee. I would actively make sure none from the Alliance caucus would do so, because that's against the wishes of the candidate. Screenshot this post if you want.

Also, I bet you can't handle this fact lol, but my House campaign was 99.99% my work. Weird, right?