Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 05, 2021, 06:52:02 PM
Talk Elections
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderators:
Brittain33
,
Gass3268
,
Virginiá
)
PA-18 Special Election - Lamb by a nose
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
18
19
20
...
103
Author
Topic: PA-18 Special Election - Lamb by a nose (Read 138988 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,250
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #350 on:
February 13, 2018, 12:26:28 AM »
Quote from: IceSpear on February 12, 2018, 03:24:14 PM
Lol. Even if the GOP is completely BTFO in 2018 and/or 2020, they'll rebound again within one or two elections. Trump will be a distant memory by then. Such is the nature of American politics.
Don’t feed the troll, this is part of his shtick.
In any case, Lamb is favored in this race. I think he wins by 3-5.
Logged
THE BuckeyeNut
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,306
Political Matrix
E: -7.48, S: -7.30
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #351 on:
February 13, 2018, 09:03:17 AM »
Quote from: GeorgiaModerate on February 12, 2018, 09:59:10 PM
Quote from: Generalissimo Mondale on February 12, 2018, 09:55:53 PM
Quote
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
I don't know whether to be happy that there's a poll coming, or unhappy because it's Gravis.
Check Gravis’ poll rating on 538. They have dramatically improved.
Logged
LimoLiberal
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,376
Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #352 on:
February 13, 2018, 10:23:46 AM »
DCCC isn't making another buy. Nothing suggest that Ds view this race as competitive.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,036
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #353 on:
February 13, 2018, 02:23:07 PM »
Ok Lamb's going to win or come within 5 points. Calling it.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 7,424
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #354 on:
February 13, 2018, 07:12:15 PM »
Quote from: Senator Pericles of Fremont on February 13, 2018, 02:23:07 PM
Ok Lamb's going to win or come within 5 points. Calling it.
Logged
¿
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
Posts: 10,753
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #355 on:
February 13, 2018, 07:31:10 PM »
Tossup.
Logged
#PACK THE COURTS
Solid4096
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 6,881
Political Matrix
E: -9.25, S: -8.88
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #356 on:
February 13, 2018, 08:00:31 PM »
Lean R. Saccone by 4%.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
Posts: 3,882
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #357 on:
February 13, 2018, 08:23:07 PM »
Lamb is an amazing politician. I am always impressed by people who aren't moderate that can convince voters that they are. (I.e. Sherrod Brown, Marco Rubio, Conor Lamb)
Logged
President Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
Posts: 10,693
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #358 on:
February 13, 2018, 09:10:59 PM »
Quote from: Young Conservative on February 13, 2018, 08:23:07 PM
Lamb is an amazing politician. I am always impressed by people who aren't moderate that can convince voters that they are. (I.e. Sherrod Brown, Marco Rubio, Conor Lamb)
How is Lamb 'not moderate'?
Come on
Logged
#PACK THE COURTS
Solid4096
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 6,881
Political Matrix
E: -9.25, S: -8.88
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #359 on:
February 13, 2018, 09:18:05 PM »
Quote from: Young Conservative on February 13, 2018, 08:23:07 PM
Lamb is an amazing politician. I am always impressed by people who aren't moderate that can convince voters that they are. (I.e. Sherrod Brown, Marco Rubio, Conor Lamb)
For me, this sort of thing is beyond frustrating because this is exactly what Larry Hogan (who is a very hardcore Conservative Republican), the Governor of the state I live in is doing.
Logged
Mondale
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 7,555
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #360 on:
February 14, 2018, 03:39:38 PM »
Poll tomorrow
Quote
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Logged
President Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
Posts: 10,693
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #361 on:
February 14, 2018, 03:46:04 PM »
How has Monmouth been this cycle? I'm forgetting.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Atlas Icon
Posts: 19,929
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #362 on:
February 14, 2018, 03:48:15 PM »
Quote from: Sestak on February 14, 2018, 03:46:04 PM
How has Monmouth been this cycle? I'm forgetting.
In VA-GOV, they consistently showed a close race (tied to a small Northam lead).
Logged
LimoLiberal
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,376
Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #363 on:
February 14, 2018, 03:52:46 PM »
Quote from: Sestak on February 14, 2018, 03:46:04 PM
How has Monmouth been this cycle? I'm forgetting.
They had Gillespie +1 than Northam +2 in the final few weeks of VA-Gov. Fail.
Their Alabama poll was very good, with a 46-46 tie at a 2017 electorate and 48-45 Jones in a Democratic turnout surge.
They had Murphy +14 in NJ, very well done.
Overall good, and I loved their turnout model idea in Alabama.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Politician
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 8,445
Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #364 on:
February 14, 2018, 05:20:58 PM »
I expect to see Saccone up 7. Everyone will immediately panic for absolutely no reason.
Logged
DTC
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
Posts: 4,202
Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #365 on:
February 14, 2018, 05:26:27 PM »
Quote from: Devout Centrist on February 14, 2018, 05:20:58 PM
I expect to see Saccone up 7. Everyone will immediately panic for absolutely no reason.
Same
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administrator
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,519
Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #366 on:
February 14, 2018, 05:49:05 PM »
Quote from: Devout Centrist on February 14, 2018, 05:20:58 PM
I expect to see Saccone up 7.
Everyone will immediately panic for absolutely no reason.
The fact that this race is even competitive is a testament to how unfavorable this environment is for Republicans. It'd be nice if Democrats won it, but it's not really necessary, and it's not exactly a district Democrats could expect to hold for long at all
(perhaps not even past 2018)
.
All this attention paid to it has set Republicans up for another round of gloating about how they managed to hold a normally safe R+11 district, completely oblivious to how low their standard of success has been lowered in the Trump era.
Logged
We Made PA Blue Again!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,492
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #367 on:
February 14, 2018, 09:57:16 PM »
Even if Conor Lamb won, media sites like The Hill will still ignore it and try to find a reason to believe the blue wave is "dead".
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
Posts: 3,882
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #368 on:
February 15, 2018, 09:09:54 AM »
If Conor Lamb wins it’ll be because of these treee factors ranked in order of importance:
1. Saccone’s incompetence/potential corruption
2. Conor Lamb’s exceptional campaigning ability
3. National environment
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
Posts: 11,246
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #369 on:
February 15, 2018, 09:37:07 AM »
Quote from: LimoLiberal on February 14, 2018, 03:52:46 PM
Quote from: Sestak on February 14, 2018, 03:46:04 PM
How has Monmouth been this cycle? I'm forgetting.
They had Gillespie +1 than Northam +2 in the final few weeks of VA-Gov. Fail.
Their Alabama poll was very good, with a 46-46 tie at a 2017 electorate and 48-45 Jones in a Democratic turnout surge.
They had Murphy +14 in NJ, very well done.
Overall good, and I loved their turnout model idea in Alabama.
That turnout model thing smacked me of hedging bets at first, but I’d be interested to see how it holds up when other pollsters do it for other races
Logged
Congrats, Griffin!
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
Posts: 21,900
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #370 on:
February 15, 2018, 09:54:38 AM »
Quote from: Young Conservative on February 15, 2018, 09:09:54 AM
If Conor Lamb wins it’ll be because of these treee factors ranked in order of importance:
1. Saccone’s incompetence/potential corruption
2. Conor Lamb’s exceptional campaigning ability
3. National environment
Gotta disagree with you there, I think it'll be:
1. National environment (without a historically toxic environment across the board for Republicans, this seat wouldn't even be remotely competitive even with everything else; I'd argue that this is far and away the most important factor. Honestly, Saccone should be winning by like 15% without breaking a sweat even in a Democratic-leaning national environment, IIRC Trump won this decidedly WWC district by about 20 points in 2016)
2. Saccone's general incompetence as a candidate is what may in the context of the national environment may be what pushes Lamb just over the finish line, but the national environment is what made this race close enough that its not inconcievable for that 1-2% Saccone doesn't get due to lazyness/incompetance to be the deciding factor. Anything within single-digits here should worry Republicans and if Saccone wins by 5% or less, then that's still a disaster for the GOP in terms of what it suggests about the midterms. It'd certainly indicate that the "Trump/GOP rebound" narrative is...well...completely baseless. This isn't like the Alabama Senate race where Republicans can just write it off as being about the candidate if they lose. Saccone didn't help, but any Republicans who think this seat is in play primarily b/c of candidate quality are only fooling themselves.
3. Well...actually that's about it. I disagree pretty strongly with you about Lamb being some sort of exceptional candidate. I mean, he's not bad or anything, but he's also nothing to write home about; he's simply an average candidate running a reasonably competent campaign. Honestly, he's not even the strongest Democratic candidate in the district and IIRC was like the 4th or 5th (might've even been 6th) choice to run here. Lamb only became the party's choice after all the top-tier recruits said they weren't interested and there's a reason for that: he's not a top-tier candidate (Lamb is on the weaker end of generic b-list, but Saccone is running such a lazy campaign that he makes Lamb look like a first-rate candidate by comparison). Again, there's nothing wrong with Lamb per-say, but someone like Brandon Neuman or Matt H. Smith would have been a much stronger recruit.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
Posts: 13,332
Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #371 on:
February 15, 2018, 12:23:10 PM »
I am really upset about Lamb's exclusive and lobbyist filled fundraising events, while claiming to stand against this. I hope that he does not pull any more shenanigans like this in the future.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
Posts: 23,183
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #372 on:
February 15, 2018, 01:04:03 PM »
Monmouth Poll.
Saccone 49
Lamb 46
https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_PA_021518/
Logged
We Made PA Blue Again!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,492
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #373 on:
February 15, 2018, 01:05:28 PM »
Oh sh*t.
Logged
Lincoln Councillor Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
Posts: 24,074
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35
Re: PA-18 Special Election - Saccone only up by 3
«
Reply #374 on:
February 15, 2018, 01:05:51 PM »
Com'on Lamb!!! You can do it!!!!
Logged
Pages:
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
18
19
20
...
103
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.
Loading...