Most impressive loss? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:10:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Most impressive loss? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which loss was most impressive?
#1
Clinton losing TX by 3.5%, 1992
 
#2
Bush losing CA by 10%, 2004
 
#3
Obama losing MT by 2.3%, 2008
 
#4
Trump losing ME by 3%, 2016
 
#5
Trump losing MN by 1.5%, 2016
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Most impressive loss?  (Read 1159 times)
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,075
United States
« on: November 15, 2017, 03:37:39 PM »

Had Perot not been in the race, Clinton could've conceivably won Texas and very well could've in 96 as well.

No, Perot was the only thing that keep the state close in '92.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.