NJ-Fox News Poll: Murphy +14
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 04, 2022, 10:31:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections
  2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, gracile)
  NJ-Fox News Poll: Murphy +14
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NJ-Fox News Poll: Murphy +14  (Read 1120 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 17, 2017, 06:01:51 PM »

Murphy - 47%
Guadagno - 33%
Someone else - 8%
Unsure - 11%

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/17/fox-news-poll-guadagno-trails-murphy-by-14-in-new-jersey-governor-race.html
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2017, 06:11:05 PM »

Safe D nothing to see here
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,854
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2017, 06:14:47 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.
Logged
BudgieForce
superbudgie1582
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,299


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2017, 06:37:08 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.

Damn, you came back all jaded.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,854
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2017, 06:42:51 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.

Damn, you came back all jaded.

lol, somewhat. I mean, I feel like my points are pretty accurate though. Tongue
Logged
Lincoln Speaker Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2017, 06:49:57 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.

Yes, you should just be happy that Dems win something. At the end of the day there isn't much difference between Murphy +15 and Murphy +30 in terms of what it will mean for the future of NJ.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,854
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2017, 06:56:31 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.

Yes, you should just be happy that Dems win something. At the end of the day there isn't much difference between Murphy +15 and Murphy +30 in terms of what it will mean for the future of NJ.

That's true for NJ, but even though I love my next door neighbors, I'm more concerned for the country as a whole. Tongue And it seems like whenever there's an actual election as opposed to polls taken months/years before one, there's not much to be optimistic about on that front. Murphy +15 and Murphy +30 may be roughly the same for NJ, but for the country as a whole they could signal two very different things.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,749
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2017, 08:41:17 PM »

The Guadagno ads and her property taxes campaign could be resonating with NJ voters...but Murphy will win by 10-20%.
Logged
Kamala
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,501
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2017, 09:55:15 PM »

The thing is, Gwadawnoh wouldn't have been the worst governor. Miles better than Christie, but a Democrat is needed now to erase all of general Christie's terribleness .
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,370
Puerto Rico



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2017, 10:13:47 PM »


Eh, I think there's a kind of an interesting story underneath the surface. Am I the only one who thinks it's kinda sad that Dems are only matching Clinton's margin here when a) the political environment is supposedly far better for Democrats now than it was a year ago b) Trump's approval is in the high 20s/low 30s in the state c) Christie's approval is in the 10s d) the Republican candidate is Christie's lieutenant governor and e) Murphy is vastly outspending Guadagno?

Meh, I guess I should just be happy Dems will finally win something for once.

Damn, you came back all jaded.

I feel a lot like IceSpear. I'm glad I'm not alone.
Logged
Sir Mohamed 🇺🇸 🇺🇦
MohamedChalid
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,041
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2017, 09:08:09 AM »

Still safe D, but looks like GOPers are coming home. Murphy won't crack the 60% mark. I think it will end up 56-40%.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2017, 09:18:24 AM »

I'm thinking this probably ends up looking like McGreeveys 2001 win over Schundler, which was something like 56%-42%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.206 seconds with 14 queries.