VA-Fox: Northam +4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 12:39:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections
  2023 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  VA-Fox: Northam +4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA-Fox: Northam +4  (Read 1544 times)
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,509


« on: September 20, 2017, 11:30:00 AM »

If the race is Northam +4 then Quinnipiac would have achieved a p value of p~.05 with their Northam +10 and a MOE of +/- 3 points (though it is worth noting - is this MOE reported for the net top like or for the individual proportions? It's not exactly clear to me they are consistent and very rarely explain where their top line comes from) in the absolute best case scenario. This is a poor result no matter how you slice it.

What's probably worse for Quinnipiac, however, is the inaccuracy of their cross tabs (again. Assuming a Northam +4 result). They showed a gargantuan gender gap of 40 points net which hasn't been replicated anywhere else, and have no age bands or political affiliations.

In other words, Wulfric is more or less right. Quinnipiac looks like a complete joke of a pollster to anyone familiar with polling methodology right now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.