The Steve Bullock talk is even weirder.
Dude, we get it, you're not impressed by him
No, the election was lost because the-then FBI Director thought it would be a great idea to write a letter to Congress about a situation involving a presidential candidate - 11 days before the election and without classifying the letter.
LMAO @ the idea that people like Bullock and Brown are more progressive than Gillibrand and Harris.
1) I'm trying to converse with TN Vol, because I actually expect him to give a coherent and somewhat polite response, so please bud out?
2) I don't care that you're a Democrat. I definitely don't think it's cool or some status symbol, and I would never lay such a distinction on myself (as you seem to be implying I am?).
3) You can believe that about Comey all you want. The leadership in "your" party seems to be smarter than you, though, and got the kick in the nads and wised up. You have Chuck Schumer going in a 100% populist direction, returing to the party's roots and real purpose, in response to Trump, and I think a lot of Democrats are thankful that people like you - who seem to only be intent on describing themselves as "liberals" because they think it bestows some label of being "enlightened" while seemingly not caring at all about the ideals of past Democrats - are losing influence in the party.
4) I didn't say Bullock was more progressive than either one of those people, are you drunk posting right now or something? I said Bullock was a solid progressive, and he is. He's not a moderate, he's definitely not right-of-center, and representing the cultural attitudes of his rural state doesn't make him either of those things.
Poll
