Is Wisconsin becoming the new Virginia
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:46:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is Wisconsin becoming the new Virginia
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Is Wisconsin becoming the new Virginia  (Read 3219 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 09, 2017, 02:35:45 AM »
« edited: July 09, 2017, 02:37:32 AM by Old School Republican »

Here's county by county data(these maps arent using Atlas colors )  :

1988:


1996:



2004:



2008:



2010(Governor):




2012:



2014(Governor) :




2016:





From here it looks like the western parts of the state were what used to flip the state over to the dem (1988, 2004,2012), but it looks like that part is trending heavily to the gop , and without that part it will be very hard for dems to win in Wisconsin.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,393
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2017, 02:38:48 AM »

WI is perfectly still within reach for Dems. It just isn't outright dem leaning anymore.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2017, 02:43:36 AM »

WI is perfectly still within reach for Dems. It just isn't outright dem leaning anymore.

In my opinion WI is lean GOP now . VA in my opinion also good have been in reach for the GOP is they nominated a Kasich, or a Rubio , and not trump .

Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2017, 02:54:28 AM »

I'll take a look at Wisconsin tomorrow maybe. Depends on the time I have. But it seems to have tentatively trended towards the GOP better than PA and has a better demographic profile for the GOP. Madison & Milwaukee versus the rest of the state will be interesting to investigate.

Notably, the Wisconsin GOP - at very cursory review - has not established a political dominance on the state level yet that would be akin to the Ohio GOP but it doesn't mean they won't. There's a narrow band of 50-52% wins (only 1 55%+ win for the statewide GOP in WI). They control the legislature, governorship, and one U.S. Senate seat. The Congressional delegation is 5-3 Republican, not necessarily overwhelming dominant.

Notably, while PA 18-29 was DNC (and so was 18-24, although by a 5 point margin), Trump won 18-24 in WI 45-43% (8% going to Johnson). Whites made up 86% of the electorate; 81% in Pennsylvania. So it's a little different there than in PA.

There seems a strong Democratic Party - the question is, is that Democratic Party poised to remain viable or will they wither?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,393
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2017, 02:57:42 AM »

WI is perfectly still within reach for Dems. It just isn't outright dem leaning anymore.

In my opinion WI is lean GOP now . VA in my opinion also good have been in reach for the GOP is they nominated a Kasich, or a Rubio , and not trump .


One election =/= a trend.
If WI votes R again in 2020, then it could probably be considered lean R. But right now it's Pure Tossup on presidential level, on average. Probably anyway.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2017, 02:58:45 AM »

Hypothesis, which I'll try to work out: Wisconsin remains a battleground state that will hinge on how well the national GOP governs during the Trump era. Pennsylvania has a distinct blue lean and tint. Wisconsin's electorate seems redder and more open to a long term alignment with the GOP than Pennsylvania. I'd give it a very tiny lean GOP right now.

The knife edge of the GOP is going to be tested in 2018 and 2020 and 2022. If the GOP can survive all these three elections, there's an enduring realignment towards the GOP in the Upper Midwest. It probably could be the one of the first states to return to the GOP after the Democrats regain power in the Presidential level. I don't know yet.

Depending on how the GOP plays its cards here, they could maintain the state's political alignment on track to becoming red.
Logged
PragmaticPopulist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,235
Ireland, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2017, 11:53:29 AM »

I'll admit that Wisconsin is no longer a leans D or likely D state, at least for now. But I'm not convinced its out of reach for Dems. Wisconsin has a long history of progressive politics, but Hillary Clinton was a terrible fit for it. The perception of her being pro-free trade and her wall street connections sealed her fate there.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2017, 11:59:25 AM »

I'll admit that Wisconsin is no longer a leans D or likely D state, at least for now. But I'm not convinced its out of reach for Dems. Wisconsin has a long history of progressive politics, but Hillary Clinton was a terrible fit for it. The perception of her being pro-free trade and her wall street connections sealed her fate there.


then why did Russ Feingold lose. I think Right to Work changed the state of Wisconsin politically to favor the GOP more .
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,393
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2017, 12:07:24 PM »

I'll admit that Wisconsin is no longer a leans D or likely D state, at least for now. But I'm not convinced its out of reach for Dems. Wisconsin has a long history of progressive politics, but Hillary Clinton was a terrible fit for it. The perception of her being pro-free trade and her wall street connections sealed her fate there.


then why did Russ Feingold lose. I think Right to Work changed the state of Wisconsin politically to favor the GOP more .
I think all that money poured into the state with no response whatsoever from the Feingold camp couldn't have helped. That being said RTW has hurt Dems in the state probably; but the effect is small most likely.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2017, 01:35:32 PM »

One Presidential loss since Reagan, where the GOP candidate got less than 50% of the vote and only beat the Democrat by 0.77%? Yeah, it's totally Lean R now.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2017, 01:55:12 PM »

One Presidential loss since Reagan, where the GOP candidate got less than 50% of the vote and only beat the Democrat by 0.77%? Yeah, it's totally Lean R now.


Look at the state since 2010
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2017, 01:58:43 PM »

One Presidential loss since Reagan, where the GOP candidate got less than 50% of the vote and only beat the Democrat by 0.77%? Yeah, it's totally Lean R now.
Agreed, especially given the state's history with progressive causes such as unionization, living wages, etc.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 09, 2017, 02:03:16 PM »

The fact that Trump was a bad fit for the state and won anyway should tell that how much WI has changed over the past 8 years. Wisconsin was very democratic for so many years, cause unions in Wisconsin would fund the Democratic apparatus in the state giving the Dem party lots of resources. Now that people are no longer required to pay union fees , dems no longer get the funding they once did thus the amount of resources they have has been reduced.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 09, 2017, 07:27:49 PM »

The fact that Trump was a bad fit for the state and won anyway should tell that how much WI has changed over the past 8 years. Wisconsin was very democratic for so many years, cause unions in Wisconsin would fund the Democratic apparatus in the state giving the Dem party lots of resources. Now that people are no longer required to pay union fees , dems no longer get the funding they once did thus the amount of resources they have has been reduced.

Trump was an exceptional fit for the state, as he was for all states in the Rust Belt.
Logged
Lachi
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,353
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2017, 08:38:36 PM »

The fact that Trump was a bad fit for the state and won anyway should tell that how much WI has changed over the past 8 years. Wisconsin was very democratic for so many years, cause unions in Wisconsin would fund the Democratic apparatus in the state giving the Dem party lots of resources. Now that people are no longer required to pay union fees , dems no longer get the funding they once did thus the amount of resources they have has been reduced.
Can you stop being a massive R hack for once?
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2017, 10:31:05 PM »

I wasn't around here in 2008 nor paying much attention to politics but I would have to assume that while Virginia was probably an interesting state to watch, you couldn't be confident at the time in thinking what it would become. You need more elections to confirm exactly how far left the state would go and how fast. Likewise with Wisconsin, we need more presidential elections, imo. Ask again on Nov 4th, 2020, and we can see where the chips fall.

My personal opinion is that there is an R trend but not on the scale of Virginia, and it's not clear how far right WI will go.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2017, 10:36:20 PM »
« Edited: July 09, 2017, 10:39:25 PM by Old School Republican »

The fact that Trump was a bad fit for the state and won anyway should tell that how much WI has changed over the past 8 years. Wisconsin was very democratic for so many years, cause unions in Wisconsin would fund the Democratic apparatus in the state giving the Dem party lots of resources. Now that people are no longer required to pay union fees , dems no longer get the funding they once did thus the amount of resources they have has been reduced.
Can you stop being a massive R hack for once?

I don't support trump so how can I be a R hack . Also I am telling you the truth ,right to work has hurt the Dems significantly in Wisconsin .
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2017, 10:37:30 PM »

The fact that Trump was a bad fit for the state and won anyway should tell that how much WI has changed over the past 8 years. Wisconsin was very democratic for so many years, cause unions in Wisconsin would fund the Democratic apparatus in the state giving the Dem party lots of resources. Now that people are no longer required to pay union fees , dems no longer get the funding they once did thus the amount of resources they have has been reduced.

Trump was an exceptional fit for the state, as he was for all states in the Rust Belt.


Um no look at the primary result from that state compared to the others . Also Ron Johnson and Scott Walker both outperformed trump in the state
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2017, 10:42:13 PM »

Wisconsin is obviously a swing state at the moment.

That said, I'm pretty bullish on the Republicans' long term prospects in the state. Unlike most of the rest of the country, there is very little age gap in voting in Wisconsin, which suggests that over time Wisconsin will likely slowly drift right compared to the mean (assuming the changes in voting will be close to a uniform swing and that the country will remain close to 50/50). As our politics becomes increasingly urban vs rural, apart from the coasts, Wisconsin as a swing state is somewhat misplaced and will probably correct itself.

Of course for all I know the 2028 election will be Jim Webb (D) vs Michael Bloomberg (R) and all the current analysis about demographics and trends will be utter trash.
Logged
GGSETTER
Rookie
**
Posts: 40
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2017, 12:05:12 PM »

One Presidential loss since Reagan, where the GOP candidate got less than 50% of the vote and only beat the Democrat by 0.77%? Yeah, it's totally Lean R now.

Don't just look at the Presidential Election look at the State Legislators. It's very red
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2017, 12:34:28 PM »

This fetish some Republicans seem to have with Wisconsin and it being Safe R is a little weird, to be honest.

I'll buy Wisconsin is going the way of Missouri/Arkansas IF several of the following happen:

-Madison loses population
-The population of the WOW counties explodes, and they stay just as Republican as before
-Counties like Sauk and Columbia don't flip back to the Democrats
-Baldwin loses in 2018
-Walker wins by more than he did in 2014
-Trump wins Wisconsin in 2020 by at least 4-5%
-We get more evidence (not just exit polls) suggesting Gen Z voters here are significantly more Republican than Millennials

Honestly, none of these might happen, and if that's the case, I think Wisconsin will be a swing state for the foreseeable future. It's a different state than Iowa.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2017, 12:45:01 PM »

This fetish some Republicans seem to have with Wisconsin and it being Safe R is a little weird, to be honest.

I'll buy Wisconsin is going the way of Missouri/Arkansas IF several of the following happen:

-Madison loses population
-The population of the WOW counties explodes, and they stay just as Republican as before
-Counties like Sauk and Columbia don't flip back to the Democrats
-Baldwin loses in 2018
-Walker wins by more than he did in 2014
-Trump wins Wisconsin in 2020 by at least 4-5%
-We get more evidence (not just exit polls) suggesting Gen Z voters here are significantly more Republican than Millennials

Honestly, none of these might happen, and if that's the case, I think Wisconsin will be a swing state for the foreseeable future. It's a different state than Iowa.


becoming Republican version of Virginia is way different then it becoming Missouri
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2017, 01:32:46 PM »

The reason Virginia went the way that it did is that the fast growing areas of the state were also trending Dem.   

In Wisconsin the fast growing areas are trending Dem as well (Dane and WoW counties).    There is growing portions of the state that are trending GOP, but since their voters are older it's likely they don't have the momentum in the state on their side like Dems did in Virginia.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,023
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2017, 01:37:14 PM »

Wouldn't say the WOW counties are really "trending D" just yet ... sure, Trump lost there, but they were the most Republican part of the state just two years ago and literally provided Walker with his victory.
Logged
Coraxion
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 906
Ethiopia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 21, 2017, 01:57:28 PM »

Wississippi will be gone in a cycle or two. Good riddance.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.075 seconds with 12 queries.