Did Appalachians vote their economic interests? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:54:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  Did Appalachians vote their economic interests? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did Appalachians vote their economic interests?
#1
Yes, and wisely so.
 
#2
Yes, but they are probably regretting it now.
 
#3
Yes, but other factors were involved.
 
#4
No.
 
#5
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 89

Author Topic: Did Appalachians vote their economic interests?  (Read 5923 times)
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


« on: April 28, 2020, 12:36:50 PM »

Some did, some didn't. I think that West Virginia was trending Republican as it was for a mix of economic and cultural reasons but that Hillary saying she wanted to put the coal industry out of business gave Trump a wider margin then he otherwise would have had.
Logged
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2020, 02:54:44 PM »

I think they voted for the candidate who they believed respected them, their family and their communities MUCH more.  Whether or not you agree with that is another thing, but I think many of these people didn't have to infer all that much to come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton and many other Democrats in other areas of the country thought VERY little of them (I mean, just look at a lot of the posts here), and they felt the only dignified thing to do was not vote for them ... kind of like a New York Republican who might have liked Ted Cruz's views refusing to vote for him after the "New York values" thing.

This is to say nothing *better* about the GOP platform for Appalachia, but it IS my opinion that Trump signaled a bit more dignity their way than Clinton or any past Republican or Democrat of the past twenty years.  So, they didn't "vote their economic interests," but I think a lot of them would readily admit that.

Because Donald Trump is nothing else if not all about dignity.

it would be much more accurate to say that trumps campaign wasn't so much about extending dignity or respect towards such voters, but rather demonizing their perceived enemies and "the other".

I was trying to analyze what I thought to be these peoples' rationale for their vote - not internet posters' opinion of why they voted that way.  I DO believe most Trump voters in this region saw things in a similar way to what I typed, and I don't think most thought of themselves as going to the polls to stop "the other," even if YOU think they did.

Except they absolutely did. And that's not just my opinion, or his opinion, or anyone else's. It is a fact. Study after study has shown strong links between racial resentment, right-wing authoritarianism, and voting for Trump. The TL;DR of it is "More prejudiced views make you more likely to vote for Trump." Shocking, I know. And it applies to Appalachia at least as well as anywhere else.

The main reason these places voted Democratic in the past, longer than the Deep South, are that Democrats were not yet seen as anti-coal and the unions were more powerful. These economic concerns were more important than social issues, which also weren't as significant a part of party platforms then, to many Appalachian voters. That's how you get Walter Mondale winning a number of Appalachian counties even as he was blown out nationwide.

However, once the Democrats turned on coal and the unions were diminished, that went away. Now all that's left to them are social issues, and the Democrats have gone farther left socially while the culture wars have blown up. Meanwhile, the Republicans have been fear-mongering to them by not only playing on their fears of "the other" (just why do you think Trump's xenophobic rhetoric was so effective exactly?) but also making them think both Democrats and immigrants are going to "take their jobs." Hillary didn't help with her talk of "putting a lot of coal miners out of business." But if they actually listened to her in context, she wanted job retraining programs for them that would phase out coal -- a dangerous, dirty job that has wrecked many of their lungs and killed many of them for generations while they've been screwed over and stuck economically -- and implement safer, higher-paying clean energy jobs. While also protecting their healthcare and economic aid.

I'm going to have to say that their failure to listen to that nuance because they'd rather listen to a con artist who s--ts on a golden toilet tell them fairy tales about how coal is going to last forever and he's going to build a wall keeping the scary brown people out makes them... ignorant, at best. Howard Stern has it right:

https://www.newsweek.com/howard-stern-tells-trump-supporters-he-hates-you-so-do-i-1503621

It's not all their fault. The education system in these areas is abysmal. They've basically been brainwashed by right-wing media. And the Democrats haven't exactly been great at messaging in these areas in recent years. But still, there is an element of bigotry there that is impossible to ignore. I've lived in this state long enough to know that. Some of the things you hear when there are no minorities around and they assume you're "one of them" can be quite shocking.

Obviously this does not apply to all people in Appalachia. Many are truly great people. And others are not bigoted but simply misguided. But it would be naive to pretend there aren't a number of genuine bigots there, who DO want to stick it to "the other" (remember the Trump supporter who said "He's not hurting the right people?"), and that doesn't play a significant role in Trump's appeal to them. There is a reason only socially conservative Democrats have a chance to compete in these areas. It's not really the economy, stupid, anymore. Coal is obviously a major factor, but these days I'd say social issues are perhaps even bigger factors and certainly contributed to how Trump was able to run up the score so much. Race is also a major reason why many of these counties didn't sharply turn on Democrats until they nominated a black man.

Even if everything you say is true one thing I despise about the modern face of liberalism is celebrating a multi-millionaire talking about how much he hates poor people, especially one who has a history of racism himself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.