Least divisive of the last 5 Presidential elections?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 03:17:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Least divisive of the last 5 Presidential elections?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Which was the LEAST divisive Presidential election?
#1
2000
 
#2
2004
 
#3
2008
 
#4
2012
 
#5
2016
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Least divisive of the last 5 Presidential elections?  (Read 5227 times)
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2017, 05:25:37 PM »

2008 was pretty divisive, I remember Obama's name being booed in McCain's concession speech.
Logged
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 10, 2017, 03:35:47 PM »

I remember 2012 being a much less emotionally charged election season than 2004, 2008, or 2016. 2004 had the wars going on and the Bush hate from the left, 2008 was a big deal because of Obama (and Palin, to a lesser extent), and 2016 goes without saying.

I also remember the 2012 election season itself being unusually quiet compared to the other three. Election fervor began to sweep the nation by 2007 and 2015, but media coverage in 2012 didn't really heat up until the conventions. I guess there wasn't much to talk about, with an incumbent president running and a pretty uneventful primary from the Republicans.

Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,874
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 10, 2017, 09:44:21 PM »
« Edited: July 12, 2017, 11:20:02 PM by DWL »

Most Divisive to Least:

1. 2016
2. 2004
3. 2008
4. 2000
5. 2012
Logged
Fuzzy Says: "Abolish NPR!"
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,675
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 10, 2017, 09:57:09 PM »

2008, because McCain and Obama were both popular.

This. 

I think it's tied with 2004, however.  It didn't have the rancor of 2012 or 2016.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,418
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2017, 08:06:42 PM »

2000 wasn't divisive before the results dispute broke out in Florida, but became very divisive once that dispute broke out. 2004 had Democrats convinced that Dubya was an imperialist theocrat and Republicans convinced that Kerry was an Al-Qaeda sympathizer. 2008 and 2012 weren't too divisive, but 2016 was very divisive.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,733
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 12, 2017, 08:27:47 PM »

2016 was only divisive because one of the major party candidates was literally and unapologetically a proud-in-his-ignorance racist. It didn't have to be.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,091
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 12, 2017, 08:37:47 PM »

From least to most:
2000
2008
2012
2004
2016
Logged
Different Republican
Rookie
**
Posts: 70
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2017, 12:50:37 PM »

2008. It was a clear victory for the Democrats. No way was McCain winning with the baggage of Bush on him.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,883


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 15, 2017, 12:59:14 PM »

I remember 2012 being a much less emotionally charged election season than 2004, 2008, or 2016. 2004 had the wars going on and the Bush hate from the left, 2008 was a big deal because of Obama (and Palin, to a lesser extent), and 2016 goes without saying.

I also remember the 2012 election season itself being unusually quiet compared to the other three. Election fervor began to sweep the nation by 2007 and 2015, but media coverage in 2012 didn't really heat up until the conventions. I guess there wasn't much to talk about, with an incumbent president running and a pretty uneventful primary from the Republicans.

This, but 2000 was by far the most tame. Bush and Gore basically engaged in a technocratic debate over an $800 billion vs $1.3 trillion tax cut.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 14 queries.