Canada: Two straight men to marry for tax reasons; gay community outraged
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 23, 2025, 03:50:02 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, KaiserDave)
  Canada: Two straight men to marry for tax reasons; gay community outraged
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Canada: Two straight men to marry for tax reasons; gay community outraged  (Read 2964 times)
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2005, 01:30:51 PM »

You weren't born wanting to commit adultery, you were born wanting to mate. You can control whether or not you want to commit adultery, you can't control whom you are sexually attracted to.

I didn't say "control who you are attracted to", rather I am simply stating: just because you feel like doing it, whether by instinct or learned behavior, doesn't make it right.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Doesn't make it wrong, either. I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.
Logged
KillerPollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -3.15, S: -0.82

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2005, 01:36:48 PM »

This is why Gay Marriage should never have been legalized. People are going to take advantage of the fact that Gays are a "protected Class" and just pretend to be gay and get all the benefits. This is another reason why I OPPOSE gay = rights. It is not the same as racism. I mean, if you're born black, you're ALWAYS going to be black (even Michael Jackson) you have no choice as to whether you choose to be black, white, asian, mixed, etc. Homosexuality cannot be determined just by looking at the person. People... I mean, EVERYONE can just pretend to be gay, and go around the laws to get these privileges.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 08, 2005, 01:44:00 PM »

This is why Gay Marriage should never have been legalized. People are going to take advantage of the fact that Gays are a "protected Class" and just pretend to be gay and get all the benefits. This is another reason why I OPPOSE gay = rights. It is not the same as racism. I mean, if you're born black, you're ALWAYS going to be black (even Michael Jackson) you have no choice as to whether you choose to be black, white, asian, mixed, etc. Homosexuality cannot be determined just by looking at the person. People... I mean, EVERYONE can just pretend to be gay, and go around the laws to get these privileges.

I oppose special treatment for minorities too, but I still support legal gay marriages(actually, I think the government should just get out of marriage and give people civil unions, leave marriage to churches and stuff). Still, your argument here has already been refuted - people of the opposite sex can get married now without love, without God, or any other such thing just so they can get tax benefits. It's more of an argument against benefits for married couples than against gay marriage.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 08, 2005, 02:35:56 PM »

I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.

Do you believe worshipping the sun is evil?
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 08, 2005, 02:38:52 PM »

I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.

Do you believe worshipping the sun is evil?

No, but I don't see anything good about it either. The sun will continue burning whether you worship it or not, and sunworshippers could use their time spent worshipping it to do something more productive.
Logged
KillerPollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -3.15, S: -0.82

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2005, 02:39:27 PM »

I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.
Open your eyes, and you will. Remember.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 08, 2005, 02:44:33 PM »

I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.
Open your eyes, and you will. Remember.

It doesn't do any harm to anyone(provided it's consensual, of course), so how is it evil? Telling me to open my eyes isn't a very good argument.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 08, 2005, 02:53:45 PM »
« Edited: August 08, 2005, 02:56:33 PM by jmfcst »

I've yet to see any remotely logical or convincing argument as to how homosexuality is evil.

Do you believe worshipping the sun is evil?

No...


No would you find the worshipping of angels "evil", yet is it condemned in the bible:

Col 2:18 Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you for the prize.

The point being...evil is not defined by you, whether or not you see any convincing arguments.  It is human nature to be comfortable with evil and we only know certain things are evil because of God's word:

Rom 7:7 Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet."
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 08, 2005, 09:43:48 PM »

But why do you limit your "he was born that way" argument to just sexual attraction?  Why not expand it to all desires?
Not all desires are inherent instinct, for one thing.

Well, I have four kids, and I can tell you they were all born with the instinct for lying, greed, envy, stealing, fits of rage, etc.

jmfsct, why do you presume to use the term 'sin' for such things?  All you can say about them is that you don't like them, or possibly that their actualization by the individual is inconvenient for other individuals or some society.  Why is it necessary for you to make the completely absurd and insupportable claim that such things are objectively 'wrong', when there is a more or less reasonable case to be made for some of them in terms of practicality.  Surely you can see that this opens you up to being considered a madman by rational people.

Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: August 08, 2005, 11:33:22 PM »

Good for them. why would the Homomsexuals care what two straight men do...
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2005, 12:12:32 AM »

Good for them. why would the Homomsexuals care what two straight men do...
What the hell is a homomsexual?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2005, 12:40:13 AM »

Good for them. why would the Homomsexuals care what two straight men do...
What the hell is a homomsexual?
lol its someone who is sexually attracted to homoms. duh. Tongue Cheesy
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2005, 12:41:46 AM »

jmfsct, why do you presume to use the term 'sin' for such things?  All you can say about them is that you don't like them, or possibly that their actualization by the individual is inconvenient for other individuals or some society.  Why is it necessary for you to make the completely absurd and insupportable claim that such things are objectively 'wrong', when there is a more or less reasonable case to be made for some of them in terms of practicality.  Surely you can see that this opens you up to being considered a madman by rational people.

I am not insane, most excellent Opedo.  What I am saying is true and reasonable.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 7 queries.