No. Only the people who were taking a single obscure poll with Gillespie up 1 as proof that "OMG THIS IS A PURE TOSSUP GILLESPIE GONNA WIN!1!" particularly when the polling average indicates a leans D, if not likely D, affair at about 5-6 points.
I'm not even exaggerating. If you read through the replies to the Monmouth poll, half of those #hottakes were a variant of that line^. It's kinda funny how the Democrats on these threads discount outlier polls that favor them (Fox's Alabama poll and the WaPo/Quinnipiac Virginia polls) while treating outliers that favor Republicans (like Virginia's Monmouth) as gospel. A consistent stand would be to simply throw them into the averages.
There's no way to know for sure whether a poll is an outlier or not until the election has actually been held. That AL-Fox poll could certainly be accurate, especially if most undecideds are GOP-leaning voters. I think the VA-Quinnipiac/WaPo polls are nonsense, but I wouldn't simply entirely
dismiss the idea that they could be accurate or ignore them. You're acting as if the results the election are basically set in stone.
And no, I've always said that this race is Lean/Likely D, and it seems like people on this forum are greatly exaggerating the importance of "candidate quality" anyway - polarization, the partisan lean of a state/district as well as the political environment (also at the state level) are equally important factors. Like I said before, I find this idea that VA is still winnable for Rs incredibly ridiculous in general.