More powerful military? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:36:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  More powerful military? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Syria vs. North Korea
#1
Syria
 
#2
North Korea
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: More powerful military?  (Read 872 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,335
United States


« on: May 01, 2017, 06:31:34 AM »

Arabs can't fight wars, Koreans can.  The Norks have more equipment and haven't had their sh**t pushed in for the last 5 years.  On the other hand, the Norks Army is, I suspect, a lot like Iraq's around 1990, huge and great on paper.....and turning to a rolling ball of burning paper after the US military shows up.  Also, the Norks ain't fought any battles in forever, and Syria has plenty of battle hardened dudes.  There is a lot of value there.

That doesn't add up to a Syria win (because Arabs can't win wars), but I don't think it's as obvious as you guys are making it.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,335
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2017, 08:40:27 AM »

Officers are often friends and family of important people/very little meritocracy.  They treat the enlisted men like sh**t.  They don't have NCOs/career enlisted with any pull.  They don't believe in maintenance and training.  They are often using Russian gear against American/western gear.  They don't communicate when the sh**t hits the fan (or even when it's not hitting the fan).  Low level officers have little independent control over their men, never take initiative.


So you're in charge of random Arab country and go to war with your non-Arab neighbors.  You send out your top tank division to the front to knock down your weaker neighbor.  You've got 1000 tanks, never used once, straight from Moscow, your neighbor only has 250, this is going to be easy.  So the Lt.Col (son-in-law to Secretary of Time Wasting) in charge of the 1st Platoon makes contact with the enemy and starts taking losses because his undertrained crew don't know how to reset the electronics on the range finder, they've got a grand total of 20 minutes seat time before today.  Well and that afternoon in the simulator.  He calls for air cover, but to do that he has to ask the guy above him, who has to ask the guy above him, who has to ask the guy in charge of Air Force, but he doesn't because he doesn't like the guy's family.  So no with no air cover they continue to take losses and fall back.  Wash, rinse, repeat.




There are lots of places to read about it, just Google.  The original article.  Part of the conclusion:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.