2016=1928? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:12:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2016=1928? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016=1928?  (Read 3532 times)
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
« on: April 17, 2017, 02:07:27 AM »
« edited: April 17, 2017, 02:38:24 AM by Shadows »

There are remarkable similarities Similar tax rates, big business preventing progressive policies, domination of the financial elite, Stock Market crash & a recession, horribly inequitable growth, real struggle of the working class.

I believe people had the next FDR with Sanders, a once in a 100 year politician. FDR massively increased government & build infrastructure, initially cut military (before WWII began), introduced revolutionary concepts in the country like minimum wage & social security, helped unions get stronger with collective bargaining, created Securities & exchange commission, signed Glass Steagal, ended prohibition of alcohol & taxed it.

Sanders is in many ways paying homage somewhat to FDR's 2nd bill of rights guaranteeing education, healthcare, good jobs etc though he doesn't go as far as FDR & neither does he try to increase taxes that high. Universal Healthcare, Tuition free college, huge infrastructure, Modern Glass Steagal & breaking the banks, ending Citizens United, 15$ minimum wage, marijuana legalization seem core "new" New Deal policies !





FDR changed economic policies at a time when people didn't believe government had huge responsibility to the people, welfare wasn't a big thing & few believed higher taxes & spending can actually help people. Country after country would follow similar policies leading to the establishment of a New World Order. Reagan & Iron lady in UK did similar re-alignment & went in an opposite direction & the whole world essentially followed suit leading to a new era.

Both had a lot of economic papers, notable speakers supporting them. Keynes, the father of modern Macroneconomics proved statistically about the requirement of government intervention in times of depression & there were many economic papers & TV/Movie/Art supporting such a cause of a bigger government. Around or pre-Reagan, you had people like Milton Freedman, Ayn Rand about cutting government & taxes & welfare, stuff like "Greed is good" etc bringing a different re-alignment. Now you have Stiglitz, Piketty, Krugman, etc as famous economists arguing for a sharp left turn with brilliant economic work & even the IMF trashing Trickle Down. You have an aversion among people about big business & yearning for fundamental change !


Both FDR & Sanders are/were staunch anti-big banks, anti-big money/corporate- FDR's "I welcome the Hatred speech" is legendary - 2 New York born guys too! Remarkably uncanny!
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2017, 03:48:38 AM »

The 1930's realignment didn't happen because of demographics, neither did the 80's for that matter. If there is a massive re-alignment & big Dem wins consistently for a while, it will be on a new bold economic message which will have its share of detractors in Dem's own party (FDR vs Conservative Dems, Reagan vs George "Voodoo Trickle Down" Bush & many others).

A major re-alignment & wins will be with a transformation inspiring president on a bold economic plan !
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.