S3: Go west young man act (failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 02:44:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S3: Go west young man act (failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S3: Go west young man act (failed)  (Read 3740 times)
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« on: April 13, 2017, 06:32:07 PM »
« edited: April 24, 2017, 07:11:05 PM by Speaker fhtagn »

Go west young man act

Quote
Anyone convicted of a violent crime, or given a life sentence, for whatever reason shall have the option to be bused to Arizona, with full expenses paid for the trip so long as the convict agrees to stay in Fremont.

Sponsor: Ben Kenobi
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2017, 06:33:15 PM »

The floor is now open for debate
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2017, 08:27:25 PM »

So how to you propose to pay for this? I was under the impression that the Atlas Conservative Party wanted to SAVE money, not cause more of a burden on the taxpayers.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2017, 07:51:56 PM »

Since no other discussion has taken place in quite some time, I'm going to call a 24 hour vote on this bill.

Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2017, 08:17:43 PM »

Nay
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2017, 10:26:43 PM »

And I'll call for an extension on the vote.

Care to explain why it is necessary?
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2017, 11:13:57 PM »

It will allow us to debate the issue longer.

There hasn't been any meaningful discussion on this in 8 DAYS. If it was that important to you, it should have been done sooner. No excuses.

You are literally just doing this to continue sitting around and getting nothing done, and it's becoming painfully obvious to everyone.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2017, 11:22:59 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I thought people might want to hear what others from Fremont thought.

Perhaps you should have thought about that prior to introducing this bill, or when there was still active discussion on the topic.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2017, 12:08:14 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Seems like we have active discussion on this bill now.

Too late, Ben.
If you wanted active discussion, you should have been more active within a reasonable time.

You can either vote, or I can just consider this as you abstaining.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2017, 12:19:02 AM »

Speaking as a former Speaker, I think we ought to consult people from Fremont.

As I have said to Ben, we are voting now. If there was a legitimate concern over what the people in Fremont thought about this, it should have been done in the 8 days where there was no discussion. There was plenty of time to bring this up before then, and I will not tolerate Ben's blatant obstruction that he has been doing for EVERY bill we vote on.

If there is an issue with him discussing topics in a timely manner, maybe he should reconsider his involvement in here.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2017, 12:56:54 AM »

Another day wouldn't kill anything. If this bill waited 8 days before having a vote called, why can't it wait another?

Because you don't actually care about hearing what Fremont has to say. As I stated, if you really cared, you would have done it BEFORE I called for a vote. It's clear you only care about the fact that another one of your bills doesn't have the support you want, and instead of accepting it, you're throwing a temper tantrum and attempting to block any bills you can from being voted on because it somehow makes you feel better.

If a Labor delegate did what you are doing now when you were Speaker, I guarantee you would not be nearly as accommodating as I have to you since becoming Speaker.

The vote is remaining open, and you have until 7:51pm EST to decide whether you want to actually do your job, or keep being childish.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Vatican City State


« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2017, 07:10:13 PM »

With 0 votes in favor, and 3 against, the bill has failed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.