both of these candidates are just awful.
it looks like potts is teh only way to go.
Out of curiosity, what defines "awful" for you? You seem to apply it quite liberally and have never reallly explained.
there is no set definition for 'awful'.
for example someone can be 'awful' for vetoeing an emergency contraception bill and having a name best fit for a dog (ex mitt romney)
on the other hand, someone can also be awful for supporting late term abortions and just being all around crazy (ex barbara boxer)
keystone phil, that other woman was shannon obrien.
