Stacy Keibler, a lady from WWE.
Anyhow, by 1968 Wallace had greatly removed himself from his former segregationist stances and you can be certain that he wouldn't be using that as the basis of a national candidacy. If the world was turned upside down and he was the Republican ticket, he would have access to a boatload of support that he didn't have access to previously. And he was pretty darn popular in states outside of the south as well. He won the Michigan Democratic Primary in 1972 which helped lead to the current caucus system they have today.
You cobble together a law and order platform of Nixon's with a pro-state's rights position, be anti-hippie, downplay segregation, and up play 'peace with honor', give it a nice Republican label.. bada bing bada boom, you have yourself an electoral winning coalition. And there's no doubt in my mind, and anyone that has studied history and doesn't swallow the Democrat re-written history, that Wallace couldn't do all of the above.
I would suggest you check out the following maps as well. Just for a little information:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wallace/maps/map_1972.htmlhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wallace/maps/map_1968.htmlhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wallace/maps/map_1964.htmlAnd if you've got a problem with the results the program spits out, take it up with the guy that wrote the code for President Elect.