Rockefeller VS Thurmond in 1960
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:58:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Rockefeller VS Thurmond in 1960
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rockefeller VS Thurmond in 1960  (Read 1973 times)
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 30, 2005, 11:01:11 AM »

What if Nelson Rockefeller(R-NY) ran against Strom Thurmond(D-SC)Huh
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2005, 03:03:06 PM »



Landslide for Rockefeller

Rockefeller                         500
Thurmond                            37
Logged
Ronald Reagan
Spl2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 292
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2005, 03:31:18 PM »


Thurmond - 203
Rockefeller - 334
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2005, 03:12:30 PM »



Landslide for Rockefeller

Rockefeller                         500
Thurmond                            37

winfield, thurmond would do much better than that in the south, especially against rockefeller.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,735


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2005, 03:15:29 PM »

If DC or I could vote, we'd both go Republican.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2005, 03:24:23 PM »

If DC or I could vote, we'd both go Republican.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2005, 11:30:20 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2005, 11:33:26 PM by Winfield »



Landslide for Rockefeller

Rockefeller                         500
Thurmond                            37

winfield, thurmond would do much better than that in the south, especially against rockefeller.

Yes, Walter, you are correct.

Though I cannot see the Strom Thurmond of 1960 making headway outside the south.

Rockefeller          423
Thurmond           114

Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2005, 11:23:33 AM »

ill agree to that map.

some states would be close.  thurmond would be competitive in md and fl, both states have a rather ugly racial history.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2007, 11:22:12 PM »


Rockefeller: 383
Thurmond: 154
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2007, 12:08:18 AM »

While I doubt Thurmond could possibly have been the Democratic standard bearer in 1960 under any circumstances, if it somehow happened, I think that between the Dewey machine in Chicago and the voters of Little Egypt, Thurmond would have had a decent chance of getting Illinois.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2007, 01:27:12 PM »

Thurmond would never have gotten the Democratic nomination.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 13 queries.