Former CIA spokesman Bill Harlow confirms that Plame was, in fact, an undercover
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/26/AR2005072602069_pf.html
Hey, you mindless Rove apoligists, what's the latest Republican talking points now? This directly contradicts the most recent line of argument. Give it up you stupid partisan hacks. If there was a Democrat 10% as curropt as Bush, I'd have left him for the wolves long ago. Let this er Bush go down in flames.
Blue Rectangle:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
So Rove told Novak nothing more than Harlow did: both told Novak that Plame worked for the CIA. Neither said in what capacity. The difference is that Harlow knew that Plame was undercover. Given the standard set in the law, this means that if Rove didn't know she was undercover, then Rove is innocent, but Harlow may be guilty.
MODU:
Interesting point, Blue.
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└:
Quote from: Blue Rectangle on July 27, 2005, 11:43:48 AM
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
So Rove told Novak nothing more than Harlow did: both told Novak that Plame worked for the CIA. Neither said in what capacity. The difference is that Harlow knew that Plame was undercover. Given the standard set in the law, this means that if Rove didn't know she was undercover, then Rove is innocent, but Harlow may be guilty.
Quit moving the goalposts. What happened to "the era of personal responsiblity"?
WalterMitty:
did anyone hear about the california national guard being investigated for misconduct in iraq?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page