2017 Special Election Thread: CT House 68
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:39:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2017 Special Election Thread: CT House 68
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: 2017 Special Election Thread: CT House 68  (Read 8426 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: February 28, 2017, 04:53:25 PM »

Turnout is reportedly light, as expected, in the 2 Senate districts with special elections today.

In Senate District 32 (the Republican seat), Watertown is one of the largest towns and has 15,523 registered voters, but had only 1,453 people vote by noon.

Polls close at 8PM Eastern.
Extrapolating 12% turnout from 10.5% turnout at midday seems misguided. Don't most people with jobs vote after work?

The 12% number from before is just what the area usually gets, though I expect it may be a bit higher than usual.

Also, some early turnout reports from SD 32 show some possibly positive signs for the Democratic candidate. Turnout is lower in the Republican's hometown.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,400
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: February 28, 2017, 08:12:50 PM »

So... anyone have a results page? I've found nothing.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: February 28, 2017, 08:14:12 PM »

So... anyone have a results page? I've found nothing.

There don't seem to be any yet.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: February 28, 2017, 08:35:44 PM »
« Edited: February 28, 2017, 08:37:17 PM by Holmes »

I found this on Twitter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/THEBehuniak/status/836745768769826816

Can't verify because the stupid CT SoS has no results page.

Same guy says it looks like Cava won't win though.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: February 28, 2017, 08:49:33 PM »

I found this on Twitter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/THEBehuniak/status/836745768769826816

Can't verify because the stupid CT SoS has no results page.

Same guy says it looks like Cava won't win though.

The guy says that Berthel wins by around 2,000 votes overall:
https://mobile.twitter.com/THEBehuniak/status/836753903144288256
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: February 28, 2017, 09:00:44 PM »

A Democratic win here would've been a big upset but these results are encouraging.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: February 28, 2017, 09:17:12 PM »

Laraine Weschler‏ @RA_Laraine
Unofficial results: Berthel 9901 to Cava 8121. Still missing some ballots that need to be hand counted. #32senatect #Ctelection
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: February 28, 2017, 09:18:31 PM »

Laraine Weschler‏ @RA_Laraine
Unofficial results: Berthel 9901 to Cava 8121. Still missing some ballots that need to be hand counted. #32senatect #Ctelection

How strong of a result would you say this is for the Democrat?
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: February 28, 2017, 09:19:34 PM »

Laraine Weschler‏ @RA_Laraine
Unofficial results: Berthel 9901 to Cava 8121. Still missing some ballots that need to be hand counted. #32senatect #Ctelection

How strong of a result would you say this is for the Democrat?

It's not bad at all. Trump won this district by 18, while Cava will end up losing by only 10 or so.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 28, 2017, 09:22:21 PM »

I wouldn't really overinterpret the results of these special elections.


This is an elections website.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 28, 2017, 09:30:32 PM »

Honestly I'm fairly pleased by these results. Democrats didn't really have a chance at SD 32, but they matched the best score on my predicted range of results.
Logged
GlobeSoc
The walrus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,979


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 28, 2017, 09:42:45 PM »

The good thing about these specials is that it shows that the off-year electorate is slight-dem right now, which is good news.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 28, 2017, 10:13:09 PM »

I wouldn't really overinterpret the results of these special elections.


You mean these special elections, or all of them? You've been putting a decent amount of emphasis on MT-AL and GA-06 yourself.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: March 01, 2017, 12:54:20 AM »

I wouldn't extrapolate too much from state legislative specials. Congressional specials, definitely, but not too much (see: NY-20, NY-23, PA-12 in 2009/10).
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: March 01, 2017, 10:30:54 AM »

I wouldn't extrapolate too much from state legislative specials. Congressional specials, definitely, but not too much (see: NY-20, NY-23, PA-12 in 2009/10).

Why would there be a difference though? Legislative elections have been shown to be obscure and far enough down ballot where opinions of the incumbent White House party generally dominate voters' decisions.

Personally I think we'll need to wait until after this November's elections to make more solid predictions, but these special elections have been showing some signs.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: March 01, 2017, 12:06:47 PM »

I wouldn't extrapolate too much from state legislative specials. Congressional specials, definitely, but not too much (see: NY-20, NY-23, PA-12 in 2009/10).

Why would there be a difference though? Legislative elections have been shown to be obscure and far enough down ballot where opinions of the incumbent White House party generally dominate voters' decisions.

Personally I think we'll need to wait until after this November's elections to make more solid predictions, but these special elections have been showing some signs.
^ This^ it should concern RWers a bit that these elections involved a fired up dem turn out with a disinterested GOP turnout because that could be a likely scenario on November 2018
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: March 01, 2017, 12:19:17 PM »

Quote from another forum:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
I'm trying not to be over optimistic because Connecticut is still a (IRL) blue state but...this is good.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: March 01, 2017, 01:01:11 PM »

Quote from another forum:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
I'm trying not to be over optimistic because Connecticut is still a (IRL) blue state but...this is good.

Still a very Republican district though, and has a lot in common with some areas of New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, etc. Obama lost the district by a slightly wider margin than Cava in 2012.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: March 01, 2017, 02:30:20 PM »

The official results will be out on Friday
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: March 01, 2017, 04:30:07 PM »

I wouldn't extrapolate too much from state legislative specials. Congressional specials, definitely, but not too much (see: NY-20, NY-23, PA-12 in 2009/10).

Why would there be a difference though? Legislative elections have been shown to be obscure and far enough down ballot where opinions of the incumbent White House party generally dominate voters' decisions.

Personally I think we'll need to wait until after this November's elections to make more solid predictions, but these special elections have been showing some signs.
As for why is there a difference? Congress is far more partisan, and for the state level, there can be state-level waves that are independent of the national wave (see Kansas 2014, where Brownback nearly lost for example). 
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: March 01, 2017, 04:47:42 PM »

Well, of course we shouldn't extrapolate these state legislative results with the federal elections, but it still means something: democratic turnout don't always go down during midterms/special elections.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: March 16, 2017, 07:13:57 PM »

For the upcoming PA 197 Election, residency issues have caused republican Lucinda Little to be the only candidate on the ballot, although there are various write-in candidates. If Little wins, she would be the district's 1st Republican Representative in 50 years.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/state/PA-Supreme-Court-makes-it-official-GOP-all-alone-on-1197th-ballot.html%3Famphtml%3Dy
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: March 21, 2017, 08:45:22 PM »

So Little got 7.5% and write-ins got 92.5%. Need to wait to see which write-in won.

http://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/ENR_NEW

Turnout was horrible but that's understandable.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: March 24, 2017, 02:17:47 PM »

Vazquez won the write-in campaign.

Emilio Vazquez (D) 1964
Cheri Honkala (G) 280
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,400
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: April 25, 2017, 07:15:42 PM »

Special election happening tonight in Connecticut's 68th House District. Trump won the district by a lot, so it shouldn't be too interesting.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 11 queries.