|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 05, 2020, 06:23:13 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, Gass3268, Virginiá)
  Governor race that looks most intersting at this point (2005-2006)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Governor race that looks most intersting at this point (2005-2006)
#1
Alabama (Riley)
 
#2
Alaska (Murkowski)
 
#3
Arizona (Napatolino)
 
#4
Arkansas (Huckabee)
 
#5
California (Schwarzenegger)
 
#6
Colorado (Owens)
 
#7
Connecticut (Rell)
 
#8
Florida (Bush)
 
#9
Georgia (Perdue)
 
#10
Hawaii (Lingle)
 
#11
Idaho (Kempthorne)
 
#12
Illinois (Blagoyevich)
 
#13
Iowa (Vilsack)
 
#14
Kansas (Sebelius)
 
#15
Maine (Baldacci)
 
#16
Maryland (Ehrlich)
 
#17
Massachusetts (Romney)
 
#18
Michigan (Granholm)
 
#19
Minnesota (Pawlenty)
 
#20
Nebraska (Heineman)
 
#21
Nevada (Guinn)
 
#22
New Hampshire (Lynch)
 
#23
New Jersey (Codey)
 
#24
New Mexico (Richardson)
 
#25
New York (Pataki)
 
#26
Ohio (Taft)
 
#27
Oklahoma (Henry)
 
#28
Oregon (Kulongski)
 
#29
Pennsylvania (Rendell)
 
#30
Rhode Island (Carcieri)
 
#31
South Carolina (Sanford)
 
#32
South Dakota (Rounds)
 
#33
Tennessee (Bredesen)
 
#34
Texas (Perry)
 
#35
Vermont (Douglas)
 
#36
Virginia (Warner)
 
#37
Wisconsin (Doyle)
 
#38
Wyoming (Freudenthal)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Governor race that looks most intersting at this point (2005-2006)  (Read 1215 times)
nini2287
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,624


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 25, 2005, 12:00:13 am »

Inspired from the Congressional thread.

I voted AL, CA, OH and WI, though there are several others I'd consider to be at least "intersting"
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,651


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2005, 12:21:47 am »

CA, IL, MD and OH
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,463


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2005, 12:35:49 am »

ME, MI, VA, NH.
ME, MI, and NH b/c of the low approval ratings of the Dem. govs.
VA for obvious reasons.
Logged
AkSaber
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,319
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2005, 01:39:59 am »

[bias]AK[/bias], CA, MD, WI.
Logged
nick
nickshepDEM
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,910


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2005, 09:42:57 am »

MD is ground zero 2006.
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,241


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2005, 09:45:24 am »

Ohio.

The Democrats look like they'll have good candidates to face down both Taft and DeWine next fall... and after PA its one of the most interesting states holding elections in 2006 IMHO.

Arkansas and California also look like promising interesting gubernatorial races. 
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,910


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2005, 09:51:16 am »

ME, MI, and NH b/c of the low approval ratings of the Dem. govs.

John Lynch doesn't have low approval ratings.
Logged
Aunty Entity
texasgurl24
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,862
Japan


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -6.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2005, 01:58:47 pm »

Arkansas,Texas,Caleefoorneea
Logged
Emsworth
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,069


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2005, 02:05:58 pm »

Maryland, Ohio, Virginia

California may become interesting, depending on the results of this year's special election.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,075
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2005, 02:43:35 pm »

I wanted to check more, but I narrowed it down to:

Connecticut     Why hasn't anyone else picked this??

Massachusetts (MA electing Romney is like Texas electing a gay socialist for governor. It made me sick in '02)

New Jersey     

Oklahoma    (also Kansas & Wyoming)
Logged
Grand Mufti of Northern Virginia
Frodo
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,166
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2005, 04:55:49 pm »
« Edited: July 25, 2005, 09:11:04 pm by Frodo »

Virginia, Maryland, Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Florida, New Jersey, and California -in no particular order.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2005, 04:58:02 pm »


^^^^^^^^

Totally agree.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,322


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2005, 05:01:59 pm »

AL, CA, GA, IA, MD, MA, OH, VA, and WI seem to be the only ones in which the probable winner is not clear as of this time.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,939
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2005, 07:24:04 pm »

Minnesota, because it affects me.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines