A Question regarding John Bell Edwards & Steve Bullock...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2025, 03:44:38 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election
  A Question regarding John Bell Edwards & Steve Bullock...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A Question regarding John Bell Edwards & Steve Bullock...  (Read 2264 times)
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,465


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 26, 2017, 04:00:31 PM »

John Bell Edwards seems to have the better resume & more interesting background (High School Valedictorian, Graduated from West Point with honors, head of the honor council at West Point, 8 years of Military Service, Father & Brother are both Sheriffs, etc).  But, he is probably disqualified in 2020 because he is pro-life (an issue which is shaping up to probably be a big campaign issue in 2020).

Steve Bullock seems more inline on the issues... but Bullock seems to have less interesting of a background/ on general narrative... And Montana hasn't seemed to standout regarding Economy, Education, etc.

Which one of the two is more charismatic, affable, etc?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,455
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2017, 04:08:26 PM »

John Bel Edwards is definitely a more firey campaigner, as Louisiana tends to make you. Bel Edwards has also maintained high popularity despite running a state in the middle of an economic crisis.

But Bullock ran a more left-wing campaign for sure, if masked in a right-wing tone.

Truthfully I like both, Bel Edwards is probably more charismatic but I don't think either are national players, at least yet.
Logged
หมูเด้ง
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,682
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2017, 04:20:22 PM »

JBE seemed interesting but he made Contempt of Cop a Hate Crime...so...
Logged
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,465


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2017, 05:27:10 PM »

Does Being Pro-Life, make John Bell Edwards a no-go from the start...at least for 2020?
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2017, 05:34:15 PM »

Does Being Pro-Life, make John Bell Edwards a no-go from the start...at least for 2020?

What makes him a no-go is the fact that the Louisiana gubernatorial election overlaps with the Democratic primary.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2017, 04:52:20 PM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2017, 05:41:25 PM »
« Edited: January 27, 2017, 06:57:39 PM by watermelon »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

I'm reading the comments on that link and both Democrats and Republicans in Louisiana seem to hate him (for different reasons).  He only seems to be popular here for some reason.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,333


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2017, 06:04:51 PM »

JBE probably wants to run for re-election, which would preclude a 2020 run.
Logged
Rjjr77
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,000
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2017, 10:53:32 PM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

I'm reading the comments on that link and both Democrats and Republicans in Louisiana seem to hate him (for different reasons).  He only seems to be popular here for some reason.

Edwards is riding a high approval rating from his handling of the natural disasters they've had in Louisiana. Considering his signature accomplishments have held massive unpopularity I expect him to actually become much more vulnerable as his reelection campaign gets closer. As for him switching? Don't think it will stop Landry for coming for him, so why would he?
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2017, 10:39:59 AM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

I'm reading the comments on that link and both Democrats and Republicans in Louisiana seem to hate him (for different reasons).  He only seems to be popular here for some reason.
Yeah that's not true. JBE is still decently popular for a Democrat elected to a statewide office, and this is after the honeymoon period.

And Figueira is right. JBE won't run in 2020 because his reelection makes that all but impossible to consider a run for the presidency.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,114


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2017, 11:52:52 AM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

There's a sense that we need a red state moderate. Since 2004, the Democrats have nominated only blue-staters for president, while in 2012 and 2016, Republicans have nominated blue-staters as well. That takes vast swathes of the country off the map, to the benefit of the Republicans.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,215
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2017, 12:32:36 PM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

There's a sense that we need a red state moderate. Since 2004, the Democrats have nominated only blue-staters for president, while in 2012 and 2016, Republicans have nominated blue-staters as well. That takes vast swathes of the country off the map, to the benefit of the Republicans.

It'd be a decent strategy if it's GENUINE.  LOL, no red state (former/downballot) Democrats - or at least not enough - saw Al Gore as a genuine Southern populist, for example.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2017, 01:05:58 PM »
« Edited: January 28, 2017, 01:07:38 PM by Vega »

If Bel Edwards were some sort of enterprising pol who showed a real knack for campaigning and governing, and was someone with actual national potential who could win a primary and general election, I think that would be one thing.

However, I don't think it's wise just to point at the one Democratic Southern Governor and say, well, he MUST be doing something right, let's make him our nominee! He won an off year election in a deep red, christian state (though Louisiana is probably the least in those categories other than Georgia in the deep South) against a prostitute utilizing diaper fetishist establishment hack. Of course, blowing Vitter out of the water was quite something, but I wouldn't say that alone qualifies him to be the nominee in 2020. He's currently as out of place in the party as Lincoln Chafee was in the GOP in 2004.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2017, 01:53:13 PM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

There's a sense that we need a red state moderate. Since 2004, the Democrats have nominated only blue-staters for president, while in 2012 and 2016, Republicans have nominated blue-staters as well. That takes vast swathes of the country off the map, to the benefit of the Republicans.
And Dems are 2 for 4 in those elections, and Republicans are 1 for 2. Which suggests it's just about worthless when choosing a nominee.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,660
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2017, 11:04:53 PM »

JBE's signature on the bill making resisting arrest a hate crime, as well as his pro-life stance and rumors of a party switch should scuttle whatever slim national chances he had. No idea why folks on this board are so enchanted with the idea.

If you think that killing a police officer is a good thing, this is why the Democratic Party is in ruins. They are the authority.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2017, 07:49:52 AM »

The idea of JBE switching parties is laughable. No Republican can be that left-wing on infrastructure and education. Y'all know that being pro-life doesn't make you a Republican, right?
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2017, 08:41:42 AM »

yeah, JBE needs to run for reelex, and Bullock needs to run for Senate. I would absolutely have included JBE in my own TL if it weren't for his re-election being in 2019
Logged
Rjjr77
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,000
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2017, 05:13:24 PM »

The idea of JBE switching parties is laughable. No Republican can be that left-wing on infrastructure and education. Y'all know that being pro-life doesn't make you a Republican, right?
Especially because it doesn't help him at all. How does that keep Landry at bay
Logged
JoshPA
Rookie
**
Posts: 236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2017, 06:45:51 PM »

If Bel Edwards were some sort of enterprising pol who showed a real knack for campaigning and governing, and was someone with actual national potential who could win a primary and general election, I think that would be one thing.

However, I don't think it's wise just to point at the one Democratic Southern Governor and say, well, he MUST be doing something right, let's make him our nominee! He won an off year election in a deep red, christian state (though Louisiana is probably the least in those categories other than Georgia in the deep South) against a prostitute utilizing diaper fetishist establishment hack. Of course, blowing Vitter out of the water was quite something, but I wouldn't say that alone qualifies him to be the nominee in 2020. He's currently as out of place in the party as Lincoln Chafee was in the GOP in 2004.

He only won because no one like vitter if a a high profile republican is the nominee in 2019 he not winning reelection
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 10 queries.