Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:54:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14
Author Topic: Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal  (Read 43947 times)
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #275 on: August 30, 2019, 05:38:56 PM »

Controversial!

I don't like the name "Renfrew" for that riding. The riding's current name is terrible (I would go with "Renfrew-Algonquin" myself), but tacking on anything to it would make it worse. I wonder if a completely new name would be popular: "Upper Ottawa Valley"?.

The trouble with "Renfrew-Algonquin" is that the heart (or most "developed" part) of Algonquin Park is in Nipissing-Timiskaming--though one could always annex that into the riding, unless that made things too geographically unmanageable.  (Maybe "Renfrew-Madawaska-Pembroke" as an alternative?)

Quote
I'd probably keep the Kanata-Carleton name instead of re-naming it Kanata-Bell. And I'd drop the "South" from Leeds-Grenville-South Lanark. 

Or invert it to Leeds-Grenville-Lanark South, kind of like Northumberland-Peterborough South.  (Which is a deceiving name, as the "Peterborough South" is P'boro *County*, not the city)
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #276 on: August 30, 2019, 08:02:15 PM »

Controversial!

I don't like the name "Renfrew" for that riding. The riding's current name is terrible (I would go with "Renfrew-Algonquin" myself), but tacking on anything to it would make it worse. I wonder if a completely new name would be popular: "Upper Ottawa Valley"?.

The trouble with "Renfrew-Algonquin" is that the heart (or most "developed" part) of Algonquin Park is in Nipissing-Timiskaming--though one could always annex that into the riding, unless that made things too geographically unmanageable.  (Maybe "Renfrew-Madawaska-Pembroke" as an alternative?)

Quote
I'd probably keep the Kanata-Carleton name instead of re-naming it Kanata-Bell. And I'd drop the "South" from Leeds-Grenville-South Lanark. 

Or invert it to Leeds-Grenville-Lanark South, kind of like Northumberland-Peterborough South.  (Which is a deceiving name, as the "Peterborough South" is P'boro *County*, not the city)

Algonquin Park isn't really developed at all. The only municipality in Nipissing District in the riding is South Algonquin, hence why I'd rather have Algonquin in the name than "Nipissing".

Northumberland-Peterborough South is also a dumb name. Not sure why they changed it from the originally planned "Northumberland-Pine Ridge". I suppose the "South" was needed to differentiate it from the city in someway. Not really a problem with Lanark (although there is a small village in the county also called Lanark).
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #277 on: September 04, 2019, 08:42:46 AM »

Fixed

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

Here are the highlights:
- Lanark County kept intact, with South Frontenac (and Kingston north of the 401) moved to Leeds-Grenville
- Renfrew is now Upper Ottawa Valley
- New names includes Kanata and Barrhaven (if Orleans, then why not)
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #278 on: September 04, 2019, 09:26:49 AM »

You need a name for the new Leeds-Grenville riding (Leeds-Grenville-Frontenac is the obvious choice).

Barrhaven doesn't work as a name, because a lot of the riding (everything north of Fallowfield) doesn't live in Barrhaven (Orleans is a bit different, as only about 10% live outside of Orleans). "Nepean South" would be a better name. Also, why just "Kanata". Most of the geographical part of the riding is outside of Kanata. Looks like most of the rural area is in what used to be Huntley Twp, so why not go with "Kanata-Huntley"?
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #279 on: September 04, 2019, 10:17:05 AM »

Leeds--Grenville--South Frontenac it is.

The 15% of residents living north of Fallowfield Road can suck it up.  Barrhaven rules!  South Nepean drools!

Kanata residents comprise 80% of the population of Kanata riding.  That's close enough for government work.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #280 on: September 05, 2019, 09:25:45 AM »

If I were making rules for riding names, one of them would be that any part of the riding that makes up at least 10% of the riding's population should be represented in the riding's name. If that makes things messy, then the riding needs to adopt very broad, all-encompassing name.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #281 on: October 28, 2019, 10:24:12 AM »

Now that the election is finished, for a few months at least, we can get back to the important stuff.

On September 17, Statistics Canada released a new set of population projections:
Population projections: Canada, provinces and territories, 2018 to 2068

I plugged the numbers for 2021 into the seat allocation formula, and came up with these seat estimates for the next federal redistribution.

Projection scenario
NL
PE
NS
NB
QC
ON
MB
SK
AB
BC
YT
NT
NU
Canada
Current seats
7
4
11
10
78
121
14
14
34
42
1
1
1
338
LG: low-growth
7
4
11
10
77
122
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
343
M1: medium-growth
7
4
11
10
77
123
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
344
M2: medium-growth
7
4
11
10
77
123
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
344
M3: medium-growth
7
4
11
10
76
122
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
342
M4: medium-growth
7
4
11
10
76
122
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
342
M5: medium-growth
7
4
11
10
76
123
14
14
37
43
1
1
1
342
HG: high-growth
7
4
11
10
77
123
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
344
SA: slow-aging
7
4
11
10
77
123
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
344
FA: fast-aging
7
4
11
10
77
122
14
14
38
43
1
1
1
343


In all scenarios Quebec would lose at least one seat.  Here are the relevant sections (51, 51A) of the Constitution, if someone wishes to double-check.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-2.html#h-6
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #282 on: October 28, 2019, 10:29:28 AM »

I think with the BQ has the balance of power there is no way they will let the government reduce the number of seats in Quebec. I mean, even the NDP was able to convince the Tories to give seats to Quebec in the last redistribution.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #283 on: January 21, 2020, 12:43:01 PM »
« Edited: January 28, 2020, 03:57:35 PM by Krago »

Guelph has hired a consultant (not me!) to redraw its ward boundaries this year.  It currently has six two-member wards.

Here is my first attempt at creating 12 single-member wards, using the 2016 Census figures as a guideline.


Proposed Guelph Ward Map


Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #284 on: January 21, 2020, 01:08:17 PM »

Is it possible to get a Subject renamed?

This thread has become a catch-all for Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal.

I sent two messages to the Mods last fall, but have received no response.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #285 on: January 22, 2020, 01:30:30 PM »

Is it possible to get a Subject renamed?



Yes, just edit the subject line in the first post.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #286 on: January 22, 2020, 01:51:40 PM »

Bless you.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #287 on: January 22, 2020, 04:44:28 PM »

That reminds me: the City of Edmonton is currently conducting a ward boundary review as well. For the first time, a citizens' commission will be leading the process and making recommendations to Council. This is the first major boundary review since the 2009 review which saw the six previous two-member wards redrawn into 12 single-member wards. Even though Edmonton's population is approaching 1 million people, there was no appetite from Council to increase the number of wards.

The commission put forward two proposals for public consultation, and those can be found here. If I have time, I may make a scenario or two of my own.

I expect Calgary to also be conducting a review this year, but given the relatively-major redraw that happened in 2016, I wouldn't expect that one to result in too much change.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #288 on: January 23, 2020, 12:49:31 PM »

No appetite to increase council size? smh.

I think Calgary's wards are second only to Toronto's in terms of population size. Edmonton must not be far behind.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #289 on: March 16, 2020, 08:51:01 AM »
« Edited: March 17, 2020, 10:23:09 AM by Krago »

A few changes to Alberta and Ontario.

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

Here are the highlights:

- Edmonton South includes recently annexed area
- area between Lacombe and Cochrane changed from north-south to east-west orientation

- Bradford added to SE Barrie and Innisfil
- Wasaga Beach and most of Springwater added to renamed Simcoe West
- SW Barrie added to renamed Barrie--Oro--Midhurst
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #290 on: March 17, 2020, 02:49:39 PM »

not a big fan of that Barrie split.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #291 on: May 25, 2020, 11:32:58 PM »

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/new-ward-boundaries-proposed-for-edmonton-ahead-of-2021-election/wcm/4c694988-2d44-4413-94ed-4f9d98b1be75/amp/

http://daveberta.ca/2020/05/new-ward-boundaries-could-shake-up-edmontons-2021-election/

https://albertapolitics.ca/2020/05/guest-post-by-john-ashton-dont-let-inner-city-ward-7s-needs-be-forgotten-in-edmontons-new-ward-map/
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,523
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #292 on: May 27, 2020, 03:58:32 PM »

Quebec municipal elections are planned for November 2021. We aree in the period of time cities need to adopt by-laws for districts.

Montreal is proposing changes to the three districts in the Rivière-des-Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles borough. The rest stays the same.
https://election-montreal.qc.ca/projetreglement/projet-reglement-districts.en.html
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #293 on: May 28, 2020, 07:30:13 PM »


Upset that they're not considering adding a seat or two, or more.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #294 on: May 29, 2020, 09:41:25 PM »


Same, although at least this map is better than either of the concepts they proposed.

There's also been talk of them perhaps naming the wards instead of numbering them, which would be nice.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,592


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #295 on: May 31, 2020, 04:14:19 AM »

What's the historical reason behind Canadian cities having so few wards in comparison to the rest of the world?
Logged
Estrella
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,000
Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #296 on: June 01, 2020, 11:52:58 AM »

What's the historical reason behind Canadian cities having so few wards in comparison to the rest of the world?

Maybe it's just a general North American 'small government' thing. The US also has many ridiculously small city councils.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #297 on: June 16, 2020, 09:29:53 PM »


City council asks for Indigenous names to be chosen for Edmonton’s new ward boundaries
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #298 on: June 22, 2020, 09:02:58 PM »
« Edited: June 22, 2020, 09:07:45 PM by Krago »

Twitter user ksituan northland (@kitsuan) created a map showing Ontario with 16 U.S. Congressional-sized districts (avg. pop. 840K).



Here's my kick at the can: https://tinyurl.com/Ontario16CD

(1)  I allowed for a 1% deviation from the average population.
(2)  Don't mind the names.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,190
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #299 on: June 22, 2020, 09:53:26 PM »

Trends are real (even in Canada):

But seriously, I find their scenario interesting because Canada would be simply added to the current US House, without increasing the number of representatives. Thus why Ontario has the same number of representatives as Ohio does in our timeline, while having around 3 million more people.

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 11 queries.