How would you describe the previous poster's ideology?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:12:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  How would you describe the previous poster's ideology?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 83
Author Topic: How would you describe the previous poster's ideology?  (Read 86933 times)
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,054
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #725 on: March 12, 2017, 02:11:48 AM »


Off topic, but why do you suddenly have my old avatar?

*SKIP*
Logged
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,969


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #726 on: March 12, 2017, 02:12:49 AM »


Sanders did focus on the interests of the poor, and mentioned poverty, inequaity, and lack of jobs in his campaign, to say otherwise is disingenuous.

SKIP

And when he did, it was in the context of evil billionaires. The "lack of jobs" was "the billionaires outsourcing them", the mention of inequality was "these billionaires are too rich", and the mentions of poverty seemed to be a part of the "why billionaires are evil" presentation.

BTW I don't think I've actually seen one of you actually criticize sanders lack of focus on the truly poor.

-skip-
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #727 on: March 12, 2017, 02:27:50 AM »


Sanders did focus on the interests of the poor, and mentioned poverty, inequaity, and lack of jobs in his campaign, to say otherwise is disingenuous.

SKIP

And when he did, it was in the context of evil billionaires. The "lack of jobs" was "the billionaires outsourcing them", the mention of inequality was "these billionaires are too rich", and the mentions of poverty seemed to be a part of the "why billionaires are evil" presentation.

BTW I don't think I've actually seen one of you actually criticize sanders lack of focus on the truly poor.

-skip-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdWyOTvLg04

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIMr-8jpymQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxMCymLO-GU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFaFV2N1KFM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZJ7f-3XGB4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W103Gs0MP1E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBL1bL2A5rw

The reasons to why he mentioned billionares, are because the gross poverty that results in the country, is because of massive income inequality, and reinforced through the massive wealth the billlionares reciveve, get and keep.
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #728 on: March 12, 2017, 02:51:19 AM »

Resetting this, for Intell, I'd simply say non-SJW socialist
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,072
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #729 on: March 12, 2017, 02:54:09 AM »

Evangelical.
Logged
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,969


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #730 on: March 12, 2017, 03:50:08 AM »


Sanders did focus on the interests of the poor, and mentioned poverty, inequaity, and lack of jobs in his campaign, to say otherwise is disingenuous.

SKIP

And when he did, it was in the context of evil billionaires. The "lack of jobs" was "the billionaires outsourcing them", the mention of inequality was "these billionaires are too rich", and the mentions of poverty seemed to be a part of the "why billionaires are evil" presentation.

BTW I don't think I've actually seen one of you actually criticize sanders lack of focus on the truly poor.

-skip-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdWyOTvLg04

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIMr-8jpymQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxMCymLO-GU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFaFV2N1KFM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZJ7f-3XGB4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W103Gs0MP1E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBL1bL2A5rw

The reasons to why he mentioned billionares, are because the gross poverty that results in the country, is because of massive income inequality, and reinforced through the massive wealth the billlionares reciveve, get and keep.

Three of these were before the campaign even started. He did talk about poverty a bit, but his main focus was the lower middle class. His biggest policies of the campaign were free collage and student debt(appeals to middle and lower middle class collage educated millennials), Universal Healthcare(which does help the poor a lot, but the poor are more focused on having food and paying the rent because they're in that bad of a situation; the people who are strongly interested in it are more middle-class people who have the money to pay for healthcare and thus see it being really overly expensive and flawed), and the minimum wage(which actually does help poor people who can get a job, but he fails to mention unemployment). Too much of the campaign is framed as a movement, a group united by ideology, and not enough about simply helping people. Why do we have to add a bunch of class conflict to the mix?

-skip-
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #731 on: March 12, 2017, 05:16:28 AM »
« Edited: March 12, 2017, 05:31:39 AM by Intell »


Sanders did focus on the interests of the poor, and mentioned poverty, inequaity, and lack of jobs in his campaign, to say otherwise is disingenuous.

SKIP

And when he did, it was in the context of evil billionaires. The "lack of jobs" was "the billionaires outsourcing them", the mention of inequality was "these billionaires are too rich", and the mentions of poverty seemed to be a part of the "why billionaires are evil" presentation.

BTW I don't think I've actually seen one of you actually criticize sanders lack of focus on the truly poor.

-skip-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdWyOTvLg04

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIMr-8jpymQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxMCymLO-GU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFaFV2N1KFM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZJ7f-3XGB4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W103Gs0MP1E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBL1bL2A5rw

The reasons to why he mentioned billionares, are because the gross poverty that results in the country, is because of massive income inequality, and reinforced through the massive wealth the billlionares reciveve, get and keep.

Three of these were before the campaign even started. He did talk about poverty a bit, but his main focus was the lower middle class. His biggest policies of the campaign were free collage and student debt(appeals to middle and lower middle class collage educated millennials), Universal Healthcare(which does help the poor a lot, but the poor are more focused on having food and paying the rent because they're in that bad of a situation; the people who are strongly interested in it are more middle-class people who have the money to pay for healthcare and thus see it being really overly expensive and flawed), and the minimum wage(which actually does help poor people who can get a job, but he fails to mention unemployment). Too much of the campaign is framed as a movement, a group united by ideology, and not enough about simply helping people. Why do we have to add a bunch of class conflict to the mix?

-skip-

Because society is driven by class conflicts, especially the rich, with extreme levels of wealth, being partly to blame, as a result of the current economic system, as inequality of the distrbution of wealth.

"free collage and student debt"- This helps the working class a lot, by being allowed acess to higher education and results in increased social mobility.

 "Universal Healthcare"- Again helps the poor, and middle class people, but also the poor not covered by Medicaid, and don't get proper funding needed from medicaid.

"Jobs"- I love how you said jobs, and before stated, jobs being outsourced to other countries (as a result of rich people and the economic system to benefit them.), while ignoring it before.

3 of it was before the campaign started, but it is there to show his consisten platform.

He's movement is driven by ideology, but an ideology aimed at helping the lives of poor and working class people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_2Ca6_TKs


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S49aeJsTJP4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJXC_FlNNH4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTbmsnEguUo

But ok.

SKIP
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #732 on: March 12, 2017, 08:28:40 AM »

L.D. Smith is a populist (sane, normal, etc.)
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,816
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #733 on: March 12, 2017, 08:29:35 AM »

Populist Democrat
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,849
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #734 on: March 12, 2017, 12:21:26 PM »

Socialist
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #735 on: March 12, 2017, 01:59:54 PM »


You are neither typical nor a reader.

Santander: Right-populist/nationalist who likes to troll.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #736 on: March 12, 2017, 02:53:27 PM »

Right Leaning Moderate Hero
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #737 on: March 12, 2017, 03:10:27 PM »

Libertarian leaning moderate hero (only libertarian leaning by a negligible amount, however, which can be ascribed to human decency and indifference to capitalism)
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #738 on: March 12, 2017, 03:40:01 PM »

A rare socially moderate Dem who also isn't hyper-left wing on economics
Logged
CapoteMonster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 486
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.49, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #739 on: March 20, 2017, 01:42:06 AM »

Soft religious right type conservative.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,072
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #740 on: March 20, 2017, 01:48:21 AM »

standard lefty.
Logged
kyc0705
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,744


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #741 on: March 20, 2017, 07:43:17 AM »

Less-standard lefty.
Logged
President of the civil service full of trans activists
Peebs
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,926
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #742 on: March 20, 2017, 08:11:41 AM »

Centrist
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,054
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #743 on: March 20, 2017, 10:35:26 AM »

Social liberal, as in both somebody who's liberal on "social issues" and a liberal that takes a center-left view on economics without being outright socialist.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #744 on: March 20, 2017, 10:59:51 AM »

Hawkish center-right liberal. While Barry Goldwater is an obvious comparison, but others might be William F. Buckley, Rudy Giuliani, Joseph Lieberman, or Tom Ridge (broad array, but a few uniting characteristics).
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,248


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #745 on: March 20, 2017, 11:34:38 AM »

Non-liberal (but not necessary "illiberal") conservative, but maybe not as much so as he makes himself out to be.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,849
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #746 on: March 20, 2017, 11:54:58 AM »

Far-left
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,248


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #747 on: March 20, 2017, 11:57:38 AM »


Aww, thank you! Love you too.

*SKIP*
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #748 on: March 20, 2017, 12:35:35 PM »

Big-league conservative
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,576
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #749 on: March 20, 2017, 01:48:31 PM »

Religious/ Christian Right conservartive
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 83  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.