Where Trump and Clinton got under 30%

[ElectionsGuy]

Not necessarily where they got above 70%, but where they each got below 30%. I also added another shade for under 40. I recommend opening the image in another tab. I shall modify California or Washington if it changes the results on these maps.

Clinton



Dark Red - Clinton under 30%
Light Red - Clinton under 40%

Trump



Dark Blue - Trump under 30%
Light Blue - Trump under 40%

[SingingAnalyst]

The Thumb of MI (Huron, Lapeer, Sanilac, and Tuscola counties) really stands out as anti-Clinton, especially considering its proximity to the anti-Trump belt (Ingham - Washtenaw - Wayne counties).

[Pericles]

That image is freaky, such a huge landmass where Clinton was just annihilated. Of course, that is not the areas with the highest population, but it gets across that rural-urban/coastal divide.

[SingingAnalyst]

Can someone combine or superimpose those two maps, since clearly no county will be shaded twice? (Nowhere did a 3rd party do that well).

[ElectionsGuy]

I forgot Story County, IA, a county Trump got under 40% in, in the first map.

[NOVA Green]

I forgot Story County, IA, a county Trump got under 40% in, in the first map.

Not sure if it is a rounding item, or if you excluded write-ins or just did the % of the two party vote, but Trump only received 39.75% in Lincoln County Oregon, according to the Oregon SoS website, so depending on the methodology you're using that might be shaded lighter blue....