|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 07, 2020, 10:07:45 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  LA 2016 runoff: Trafalgar (R) - Kennedy + 23
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: LA 2016 runoff: Trafalgar (R) - Kennedy + 23  (Read 2737 times)
AOC Stan
dfwlibertylover
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,582
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 18, 2016, 02:02:00 pm »

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4lhKxf9pMitN1gydzlLMjBLQ0E/view

Kennedy - 58
Campbell - 35
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,517
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2016, 02:18:40 pm »
« Edited: November 18, 2016, 03:41:20 pm by Maxwell »

Looks about right. Fayard was the Democrat who could've made the race at least somewhat competitive.

I mean maybe, but only because oil companies might have supported her, because Campbell was the only anti-oil interest candidate.

I mean really there was only a chance of a competitive run-off with (among the realistic Republicans) Fleming, who is the most knee jerk conservative and easiest to tie to BOBBY JINDAL, a pariah of the state at this point.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,853
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2016, 02:34:12 pm »

Nice to see one of the nation's gold standard pollsters polling this race.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2016, 04:38:13 pm »

Looks about right. Fayard was the Democrat who could've made the race at least somewhat competitive.

Er, no.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,853
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2016, 06:18:02 pm »

Looks about right. Fayard was the Democrat who could've made the race at least somewhat competitive.

Er, no.

Fayard is pro-oil, Campbell is not.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,251
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2016, 06:35:59 pm »

Looks about right. Fayard was the Democrat who could've made the race at least somewhat competitive.
I agree, mostly.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,376
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2016, 06:40:13 pm »

But... but I thought Trafalgar was trash... Cry
Logged
Green Line
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,427
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2016, 06:50:10 pm »

THE GOLD STANDARD. Let it be so.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,044


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2016, 01:22:44 pm »

Had Clinton won and there was a Special Senate election in a deep blue state like Massachusetts, enough idiot Democratic voters probably would have helped elect a Republican because Hillary needed a "check".

Democrats need stop crossing over to elect Republican governor's in state like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.  Republicans clearly won't return the favor in Texas, Idaho, Utah, or any southern state.
Logged
smoltchanov
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,599
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2016, 01:35:07 pm »

Had Clinton won and there was a Special Senate election in a deep blue state like Massachusetts, enough idiot Democratic voters probably would have helped elect a Republican because Hillary needed a "check".

Democrats need stop crossing over to elect Republican governor's in state like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.  Republicans clearly won't return the favor in Texas, Idaho, Utah, or any southern state.

It's for these Democrats to decide, and so far they decide differently. Not sure they need your advice so much...
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,857
Venezuela


Political Matrix
E: 3.29, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2016, 04:37:14 pm »

Nice to see one of the nation's gold standard pollsters polling this race.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,960
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: 5.30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2016, 09:48:26 pm »

Whatever I'm going to say is probably going to be wrong, judging by the junkposts I wasted my time on before November 8. That said... likely R.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,453
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2016, 11:08:34 pm »

This pollster is the gold standard? I didn't realize that Trump won Nevada by 5...

It probably won't be this lopsided, but I'll be stunned if it's at all close. Kennedy probably wins 57-43 or 58-42, something like that.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,422
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2016, 12:46:44 am »

Had Clinton won and there was a Special Senate election in a deep blue state like Massachusetts, enough idiot Democratic voters probably would have helped elect a Republican because Hillary needed a "check".

Democrats need stop crossing over to elect Republican governor's in state like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.  Republicans clearly won't return the favor in Texas, Idaho, Utah, or any southern state.

It's for these Democrats to decide, and so far they decide differently. Not sure they need your advice so much...

It also ignores the fact that many of those "Democrats" in Vermont and Massachusetts are registered Independents that Republicans nationwide are out of step with but locally are more in tune with.
Logged
smoltchanov
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,599
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2016, 08:22:42 am »

Had Clinton won and there was a Special Senate election in a deep blue state like Massachusetts, enough idiot Democratic voters probably would have helped elect a Republican because Hillary needed a "check".

Democrats need stop crossing over to elect Republican governor's in state like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.  Republicans clearly won't return the favor in Texas, Idaho, Utah, or any southern state.

It's for these Democrats to decide, and so far they decide differently. Not sure they need your advice so much...

It also ignores the fact that many of those "Democrats" in Vermont and Massachusetts are registered Independents that Republicans nationwide are out of step with but locally are more in tune with.

That's too. But there are enough "real" registered Democrats in New England states, who are moderate enough to support Scott, Baker and some - even Sununu. After all - New England is known not only for it's social liberalism, but for some reasonable fiscal conservatism too...
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,147


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2016, 04:45:35 pm »

Had Clinton won and there was a Special Senate election in a deep blue state like Massachusetts, enough idiot Democratic voters probably would have helped elect a Republican because Hillary needed a "check".

Democrats need stop crossing over to elect Republican governor's in state like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.  Republicans clearly won't return the favor in Texas, Idaho, Utah, or any southern state.

It's for these Democrats to decide, and so far they decide differently. Not sure they need your advice so much...

It also ignores the fact that many of those "Democrats" in Vermont and Massachusetts are registered Independents that Republicans nationwide are out of step with but locally are more in tune with.

Lol@ the idea that "registered independent" means anything.

Also lol@Phips confusing gubernatorial and Senate elections

And lol@ Smoltchanov implying that trying to convince people to join your political side is somehow bad
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,853
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2016, 01:25:21 am »

LOUISIANA GOLD STANDARD RIGHT HERE FOLKS!
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,694
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2016, 10:13:54 pm »

LOUISIANA America's GOLD STANDARD RIGHT HERE FOLKS!
Also, side note: Fayard could've won if the Democrat Senatorial committee jumped on board with her. Kennedy was a weak candidate; all he had was name recognition.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.131 seconds with 14 queries.