|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 27, 2021, 02:25:38 PM

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24  (Read 1254 times)
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,427
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 04, 2016, 06:07:48 PM »
Link.

Clinton 54%
Trump 30%
Johnson 4%
Stein 3%
Logged
Monstro Believed in a Blue Georgia (and a Blue Texas)
Interlocutor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,323


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2016, 06:27:21 PM »
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Politician
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,406
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2016, 06:28:35 PM »
Quote from: Interlocutor on November 04, 2016, 06:27:21 PM
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question
If it doesn't pass, I'll suck your genitals.
Logged
Jacobin
Jacobin American
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,756
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2016, 06:30:53 PM »
Quote from: Devout Centrist on November 04, 2016, 06:28:35 PM
Quote from: Interlocutor on November 04, 2016, 06:27:21 PM
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question
If it doesn't pass, I'll suck your genitals.

Wut
Logged
Mike88
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,321
Portugal


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2016, 06:37:04 PM »
What is Prop 61?
Logged
Jacobin
Jacobin American
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,756
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2016, 06:43:09 PM »
« Edited: November 04, 2016, 06:45:13 PM by Jacobin American »

It's a ballot initiative to regulate the cost of marijuana sold by your dealer. It allows you to anonymously turn in any dealer who charges over the state regulated price. Like all things in California, the cost of marijuana is way too high and the citizens have spoken, demanding action.




Nah, but seriously, this is it...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61,_Drug_Price_Standards_(2016)
Logged
Monstro Believed in a Blue Georgia (and a Blue Texas)
Interlocutor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,323


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2016, 06:45:16 PM »

That and its one of the most expensive ballot measures this year. Big pharma's spent over $100 million in opposition to it. The mailbox and commercial breaks have been flooded with Prop 61 ads, typically against it. Bernie's been a pretty visible supporter of it here
Logged
Mike88
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,321
Portugal


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2016, 06:49:02 PM »
So, drug companies are selling to state agencies marijuana above the market price, right?
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2016, 07:06:57 PM »
Calli Purple heart's Bernie 66-27!
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,570
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2016, 10:17:26 PM »
New Poll: California President by University of S. California on 2016-10-30

Summary: D: 54%, R: 28%, U: 7%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Kamalafornia Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,701
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2016, 12:38:43 AM »
Quote from: Mike88 on November 04, 2016, 06:49:02 PM
So, drug companies are selling to state agencies marijuana above the market price, right?

The marijuana thing was a joke. Basically it would make it so that the state has to buy drugs for the same price that Veterans Affairs pays for them.

It should theoretically lower prices, but there's fears that the drug companies will increase the price that the VA pays.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.149 seconds with 13 queries.