If Quinnipiac is rated an 'A' then whatever the rating system is it is trash. I mean they aren't bad for a uni pollster... in their own state... but...
Yes. I think his ratings rely too much on methodology (which is obviously important... and Quinnipiac is live caller and calls cell phones, etc. so it makes sense that it would be rated higher than average) and not enough on actual accuracy (which is much more important).
It's hilarious: the man built his name on an injection of empiricism into public discourse about polling, only to retreat into a mannered and theory-driven safe space!
