Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:05:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way)  (Read 951 times)
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 05, 2016, 07:27:20 PM »

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/2016.Reuters.11.05.16.pdf
Was Clinton + 8 (4way) and  + 6 (2way) 2 days ago

4 way:
Clinton - 43
Trump - 39
Johnson - 6
Stein - 2

2 way:
Clinton - 44
Trump - 40
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2016, 07:28:40 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
Logged
alomas
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2016, 07:30:50 PM »

Halved! Some numbers are strange though, Clinton being viewed as favourable! Almost half of Indies not voting for major parties, hmm.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2016, 07:32:10 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2016, 07:35:47 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

You can think that, but Reuters fluctuates. Go look in the primary board and see our arguments with Jfern about it.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,099
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2016, 07:42:08 PM »

About where the race stands, IMO.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2016, 07:44:00 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2016, 07:55:26 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
It is like Sean Trende said, it is not the exact number but rather the trend that matters.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2016, 07:56:24 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
It is like Sean Trende said, it is not the exact number but rather the trend that matters.

No... the trend is garbage too.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2016, 07:58:11 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
It is like Sean Trende said, it is not the exact number but rather the trend that matters.

No... the trend is garbage too.
Sad
Logged
mark_twain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 427
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2016, 08:16:53 PM »


Put it this way, there is no point in fooling yourself, when there are only 3 days until the election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.