Wisconsin (Marquette): Feingold +1

[Xing]

Considering that Marquette has been bearish on Feingold, this isn't as bad as it looks. Feingold should win this, though it won't be a blowout.

[Xing]

Wisconsin has really turned to the dark side as of late. Ron Johnson is a vile slimeball who doesn't deserve to represent a pile of dirt.

[Xing]

Wisconsin has really turned to the dark side as of late. Ron Johnson is a vile slimeball who doesn't deserve to represent a pile of dirt.

Cry moar. Loved to see Feingold go down. My absolute favorite upset of the night.

This. If McCaskill can represent MO in the Senate, then Johnson sure as hell can represent WI.

So, you'd have no problem with her getting re-elected as well, then? Great.

[Xing]

Wisconsin has really turned to the dark side as of late. Ron Johnson is a vile slimeball who doesn't deserve to represent a pile of dirt.

Cry moar. Loved to see Feingold go down. My absolute favorite upset of the night.

This. If McCaskill can represent MO in the Senate, then Johnson sure as hell can represent WI.

So, you'd have no problem with her getting re-elected as well, then? Great.

Well, WI is at least a swing state and already has a very liberal Senator. Anyway, at least Johnson is not a fake moderate, unlike so many other Senators. You have to give him credit for that.

So... you're okay with Baldwin winning, then? Look, I don't hate Johnson because of which state he's from, I hate him because he goes against pretty much everything I stand for. I'll take a fake moderate over a far right slimeball. Conservatives can do better than him.

[Xing]

So... you're okay with Baldwin winning, then?

I don't agree with her on many things, but yeah, I'd rather see her win than Heitkamp, Tester or McCaskill (LOL).

That's... interesting. I mean, Tester and McCaskill aren't really moderate per se, but if you prefer Senators who are decidedly liberal to those who aren't quite as left-leaning, that's your call to make.