YouGov/Economist National Poll: Clinton +3

[amdcpus]

Clinton 45%

Trump 42%

Johnson 4%

Stein 2%

October 30 - November 1.

https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/11/02/post-comey-poll-clinton-leads-three/

[bilaps]

it's 46( no change)
      43 (+2) since the last poll

[Erich Maria Remarque]

Only 27% thinks Clinton is honest and trustworthy.

             

[StatesPoll]

 

Hillary ahead only +3% with D+21% Skewed samples? hahahaha

1288 RV: DEM 546 RV (42.4%) | REP 275 RV (21.35%) | IND 467 RV(36.25%)

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/0c8pv9xegd/econTabReport.pdf

[The Daily Beagle]

It's 45 to 42, right?

Like I said, if there's no more major oppo research by the VRWC, she will win. Else, she's cooked.

Only 27% thinks Clinton is honest and trustworthy.

           

Because she is a really (((Hillary Clinton))), amirite?

[BundouYMB]

It seems 73% of the country are uninformed sheep who believe the mainstream media propaganda campaign against Clinton. Very sad.

[Arch]

Looks good. Remember 2012 was D+4.

[The Daily Beagle]

Looks good. Remember 2012 was D+4.

If I had to guess, it will be

Clinton 49
Drumpf 46
Johnson 3
Stain 1
Mc Muffin .6
Others .4

[Pyro]

Only 27% thinks Clinton is honest and trustworthy.

           

Those favorability #s sum up this entire election.

[Phony Moderate]

It seems 73% of the country are uninformed sheep who believe the mainstream media propaganda campaign against Clinton. Very sad.

Anyone who has been in national politics for as long as she has can't really be honest and trustworthy, regardless of what the mainstream media and the FBI say. I'd say the same about Obama, McCain, Biden etc. Trump as well, but he's another case.

[jaichind]

The YouGov model from

https://today.yougov.com/us-election/

has it Clinton ahead  47.7 to 44

I wounder if the YouGov model is being used to feed this poll or is it totally separate polling. 

[Mr. Morden]

[Erich Maria Remarque]

^^^^

Oh, they still have RV model.

[Mr. Morden]

^^^^

Oh, they still have RV model.

If you look at the crosstab page, they also give a LV result, which is:

Clinton 46%
Trump 43%
Johnson 4%
Stein 2%

[Mr. Morden]

Dems
Clinton 90%
Trump 5%
Stein 1%
Johnson 0%

GOP
Trump 89%
Clinton 5%
Johnson 2%
Stein 0%

Indies
Trump 51%
Clinton 28%
Johnson 9%
Stein 3%

men: Trump +3
women: Clinton +7
under 30: Clinton +46
30-44: Clinton +9
45-64: Trump +5
65+: Trump +23
whites: Trump +20
blacks: Clinton +80
Hispanics: Clinton +55
under $50k: Clinton +15
$50-100k: Trump +12
over $100k: Clinton +5

So we have another poll with Trump doing better with those in the $50-100k income range than he does with those over $100k.

[Torie]

"So we have another poll with Trump doing better with those in the $50-100k income range than he does with those over $100k."

Surely this does not shock you, correct?  It totally tracks the CW.

[Mr. Morden]

More crosstabs…

People who voted in the Dem. primaries:
Clinton 83%
Trump 9%
Stein 3%
Johnson 2%

People who voted in the GOP primaries:
Trump 82%
Clinton 8%
Johnson 5%
Stein 0%

People who supported Sanders in the primaries:
Clinton 68%
Trump 15%
Stein 7%
Johnson 4%

People who supported a Republican candidate other than Trump in the primaries:
Trump 70%
Clinton 11%
Johnson 9%
Stein 0%

97% of those who backed Clinton in the primary still back her in the GE.  97% of those who backed Trump in the primary still back him in the GE.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

^^^^

Oh, they still have RV model.

If you look at the crosstab page, they also give a LV result, which is:

Clinton 46%
Trump 43%
Johnson 4%
Stein 2%

Ok. Thanks. Still intresting that they think RV model is better (since it's numbers are in the toplines and the graph)

[Mr. Morden]

"So we have another poll with Trump doing better with those in the $50-100k income range than he does with those over $100k."

Surely this does not shock you, correct?  It totally tracks the CW.

No, it doesn't shock me, but it is a brand new thing, compared to past elections.  In 2008, the Obama/McCain margin was the same for those in the middle income group as for the upper income group, if we trust the exit polls.  But in every other presidential election since the dawn of polling, the GOP candidate's best income group was the rich.  So to see the GOP candidate actually do better with the middle income group would be totally new.

[bilaps]

but Trump wining 2% more of those who voted for other candidate in R primary than Clinton of those who voted for other candidate in D primary

also, one of 2 things isn't true:

a) Trump winning indies 23%
b) Trump losing horserace number

So either Trump isn't winning these indies so much or Yougov should be ashamed of their D-R-I screen

[jaichind]

Hillary ahead only +3% with D+21% Skewed samples? hahahaha

1288 RV: DEM 546 RV (42.4%) | REP 275 RV (21.35%) | IND 467 RV(36.25%)

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/0c8pv9xegd/econTabReport.pdf

Along the same lines, this poll has Generic Congressional vote as Dem +5.  I so it seems that Trump is over performing the generic GOP as per this poll.  And while I doubt the Generic Congressional Vote is Dem +5 but if it is then Trump for sure loses and Dems recapture Senate by a significant margin along with retaking the House.

[Mr. Morden]

but Trump wining 2% more of those who voted for other candidate in R primary than Clinton of those who voted for other candidate in D primary

But Republicans who backed a candidate other than Trump make up a larger share of the party than Dems who backed a candidate other than Clinton.  After all, Clinton won ~55% of the Dem. primary vote and Trump only won ~45% of the GOP primary vote.

[The Daily Beagle]

So yeah, this poll can be unskewed the sh**t out of but it holds up.

[Ebsy]

I don't believe the favorability numbers at all.

[Torie]

"So we have another poll with Trump doing better with those in the $50-100k income range than he does with those over $100k."

Surely this does not shock you, correct?  It totally tracks the CW.

No, it doesn't shock me, but it is a brand new thing, compared to past elections.  In 2008, the Obama/McCain margin was the same for those in the middle income group as for the upper income group, if we trust the exit polls.  But in every other presidential election since the dawn of polling, the GOP candidate's best income group was the rich.  So to see the GOP candidate actually do better with the middle income group would be totally new.

Putting aside that many rich might perceive that Trump has temperament issues, it's also brand new that a Pub candidate advocates policies (to the extent he has any that are other than just idle talking point jive) that would screw the rich too.