MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:25:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3  (Read 2216 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 31, 2016, 11:19:51 AM »

47% Roy Blunt (R, inc.)
44% Jason Kander (D)

The poll was taken Oct. 27 and 28. It tallied 1,698 surveys with a margin of error of +/- 2.38% percent.

http://themissouritimes.com/35134/blunt-opens-lead-kander-new-poll/
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,578
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2016, 11:21:04 AM »

Finally they release their poll!

Still a Toss-Up race though.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2016, 11:28:18 AM »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,536
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2016, 11:32:43 AM »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
When it's affiliated with the campaign, it really is bad.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2016, 11:36:10 AM »

Terrible poll for Blunt, since this is (R)emington. If he underperforms Trump by 11, he'll probably lose.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,612
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2016, 12:01:31 PM »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.
Logged
crazy jimmie
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,513


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2016, 12:04:38 PM »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.


This is actually a Republican poll. But I am still scared.. maybe the forum was right when a few months ago many said Greitens would landslide.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,612
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2016, 12:10:33 PM »

Yes Remington is Republican, just like PPP is Democratic, but that does not mean there are methodological problems with their research. If any of you can point out Remington did anything wrong in conducting this poll I'll be the first to say you're right, but this does not seem like a particularly strange result at all. If this was Blunt +6, that would be fishy, but Blunt +3 is perfectly believable.

Not sure what Greitens has to do with this.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2016, 12:37:03 PM »

If you look at pretty much all of their other results, you'll find that this pollster has had a consistent Republican bias. PPP, while it is a Democratic pollster, has not had the same systemic bias, except in a few key races.

As for the coattail effect, well, if Heck, Toomey, and Ayotte all go down, that's some pretty solid evidence for coattails. One specific race with a strong Democratic challenger and a very generic incumbent doesn't exactly disprove what's been a very obvious trend over the past two decades.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.