|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 20, 2020, 06:29:52 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3  (Read 1268 times)
Beto/Biden/Allred voter 4 Cornyn's NUT maps
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,213
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 31, 2016, 11:19:51 am »

47% Roy Blunt (R, inc.)
44% Jason Kander (D)

The poll was taken Oct. 27 and 28. It tallied 1,698 surveys with a margin of error of +/- 2.38% percent.

http://themissouritimes.com/35134/blunt-opens-lead-kander-new-poll/
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,015
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: 0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2016, 11:21:04 am »

Finally they release their poll!

Still a Toss-Up race though.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,194
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2016, 11:28:18 am »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,389
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2016, 11:32:43 am »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
When it's affiliated with the campaign, it really is bad.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,887
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2016, 11:36:10 am »

Terrible poll for Blunt, since this is (R)emington. If he underperforms Trump by 11, he'll probably lose.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,956
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: 5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2016, 12:01:31 pm »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.
Logged
jimmie
jamespol
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2016, 12:04:38 pm »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.


This is actually a Republican poll. But I am still scared.. maybe the forum was right when a few months ago many said Greitens would landslide.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,956
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: 5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2016, 12:10:33 pm »

Yes Remington is Republican, just like PPP is Democratic, but that does not mean there are methodological problems with their research. If any of you can point out Remington did anything wrong in conducting this poll I'll be the first to say you're right, but this does not seem like a particularly strange result at all. If this was Blunt +6, that would be fishy, but Blunt +3 is perfectly believable.

Not sure what Greitens has to do with this.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,887
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2016, 12:37:03 pm »

If you look at pretty much all of their other results, you'll find that this pollster has had a consistent Republican bias. PPP, while it is a Democratic pollster, has not had the same systemic bias, except in a few key races.

As for the coattail effect, well, if Heck, Toomey, and Ayotte all go down, that's some pretty solid evidence for coattails. One specific race with a strong Democratic challenger and a very generic incumbent doesn't exactly disprove what's been a very obvious trend over the past two decades.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.081 seconds with 14 queries.