NBC/WSJ: Clinton +6/+6 (NC), Clinton +1/4way, Tie/H2H (FL) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:01:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NBC/WSJ: Clinton +6/+6 (NC), Clinton +1/4way, Tie/H2H (FL) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NBC/WSJ: Clinton +6/+6 (NC), Clinton +1/4way, Tie/H2H (FL)  (Read 5684 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« on: October 30, 2016, 01:44:53 PM »

Given NC early voting, it seems that the most realistic victory for Trump is:

Romney - NC + FL + OH + IA + NV + ME-02

Trump could possibly lose NE-02 in this scenario and even fail to win ME-02 for 269 electoral votes.

Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2016, 01:49:34 PM »

Given NC early voting, it seems that the most realistic victory for Trump is:

Romney - NC + FL + OH + IA + NV + ME-02

Trump could possibly lose NE-02 in this scenario and even fail to win ME-02 for 269 electoral votes.



But given NV early voting, which has been even more favorable for Clinton, this seems very hard to achieve.

Indeed. Back to the drawing board.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2016, 01:55:20 PM »

I forgot to add PA.

Somehow, I am taking PA for granted. Smiley
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2016, 02:09:29 PM »


Smiley

Well, back to the drawing board.

And I need more info before I come up with another Trump win that is actually realistic.

Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.