The weird thing with Alaska is that a large majority of votes are actually cast on ED.
So, for example if early returns show Clinton wining big time it could play both ways in terms of both Democratic and Republican turnout.
So we have a state that is 1-2 time zones out from the West Coast that typically locals feel like their vote doesn't matter when an outcome is already decided, how will this actually play out on ED?
Will it benefit Trump/Clinton or be a total wash when it comes to Alaskans voting in a Pres Election, with no major statewide candidates and ballot measures to spark turnout???
There is an interesting Senate race there, although I think pretty much everyone agrees Murkowski is headed for a comfortable re-election.
But she is considered a total Maverick, although with slightly less gravitas than former Senator Ernest Gruening, who was one of two Senators (The other being Oregonians much beloved Mark Hatfield) to vote against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution that created an authorization of War in Vietnam, where the lies of the LBJ administration is now historical evidence.
Murkowski won an election as independent after losing against a total Tea-Bagger, and the voters of her state feel that she represents their statewide interests...
So yes... agreed that she wins comfortably, while the state runs close at the Presidential level...
Out here in the PacNW we like our Senators to have a spine and buck party lines on principle, but Trump is viewed on a completely separate level.