MI-Fox Mitchell: Clinton +8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:16:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MI-Fox Mitchell: Clinton +8
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI-Fox Mitchell: Clinton +8  (Read 1530 times)
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 24, 2016, 07:32:07 PM »

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/FOX_2_Detroit-Mitchell_Poll_of_MI_Press_Clinton_v_Trump_10-24-16.pdf

(Clinton 49% - Trump 41%- Johnson 3% - Stein 1%)
Logged
No War, but the War on Christmas
iBizzBee
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,796

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2016, 07:38:32 PM »

I want to get off #MadamePresident's wild ride, I can't take all this winning.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2016, 08:04:20 PM »

New Poll: Michigan President by Mitchell Research on 2016-10-23

Summary: D: 49%, R: 41%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2016, 08:07:52 PM »

If my understanding is correct when they say that Trump is leading narrowly in the "Tri County Area", presumably Wayne, Macomb, and Oakland, while still leading +8 in Michigan these folks have much stronger strains of herb than are currently available in the West Coast and Colorado....

Assuming this is a huge MOE and sample size issue, but I can't fathom Clinton losing Metro Detroit, while winning by +8 statewide.

I suspect Michigan is more like a +10-12 C at this point in the race....
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2016, 08:15:20 PM »

If my understanding is correct when they say that Trump is leading narrowly in the "Tri County Area", presumably Wayne, Macomb, and Oakland, while still leading +8 in Michigan these folks have much stronger strains of herb than are currently available in the West Coast and Colorado....

Assuming this is a huge MOE and sample size issue, but I can't fathom Clinton losing Metro Detroit, while winning by +8 statewide.

I suspect Michigan is more like a +10-12 C at this point in the race....

Tri Counties are Bay, Midland, and Saginaw.
Logged
Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist
darthpi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2016, 08:21:11 PM »

If my understanding is correct when they say that Trump is leading narrowly in the "Tri County Area", presumably Wayne, Macomb, and Oakland, while still leading +8 in Michigan these folks have much stronger strains of herb than are currently available in the West Coast and Colorado....

Assuming this is a huge MOE and sample size issue, but I can't fathom Clinton losing Metro Detroit, while winning by +8 statewide.

I suspect Michigan is more like a +10-12 C at this point in the race....

I'm thinking tri-county may mean those three counties while specifically excluding the city of Detroit. Though those numbers still seem odd.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2016, 10:06:39 PM »

Strange that 538 did not enter this poll into their database.
Does anyone know why ?
Is there some technical reason why they are excluding it ?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 13 queries.