|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 30, 2020, 09:24:11 PM
News: 2020 Election day live thread: https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=409870.0

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  ABC/WaPo Tracking poll megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Author Topic: ABC/WaPo Tracking poll megathread  (Read 26720 times)
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #200 on: October 29, 2016, 10:18:10 AM »

Its the likely voter screen. Apparently the screen for voter intention is causing the shifts.

https://twitter.com/nickgourevitch/status/792332697708421120
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #201 on: October 29, 2016, 10:24:41 AM »

Its the likely voter screen. Apparently the screen for voter intention is causing the shifts.

https://twitter.com/nickgourevitch/status/792332697708421120

So Clinton always been just up 2% or probably less? Roll Eyes
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,612
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #202 on: October 29, 2016, 10:25:23 AM »

Well, this teaches us a lesson in statistical variance, but still....from +12 to +2 in a few days with no real news (before emails) is quite something.

That means their likely voter model is terrible
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #203 on: October 29, 2016, 10:29:16 AM »

Its the likely voter screen. Apparently the screen for voter intention is causing the shifts.

https://twitter.com/nickgourevitch/status/792332697708421120

So Clinton always been just up 2% or probably less? Roll Eyes
No, but it shows that it really doesn't know what the number is.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #204 on: October 29, 2016, 10:30:46 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #205 on: October 29, 2016, 10:32:21 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #206 on: October 29, 2016, 10:35:07 AM »

Its the likely voter screen. Apparently the screen for voter intention is causing the shifts.

https://twitter.com/nickgourevitch/status/792332697708421120

So Clinton always been just up 2% or probably less? Roll Eyes
No, but it shows that it really doesn't know what the number is.
They use presumably about the same model that always. The model that gave them A+ rating on 538. We don't have any evidence that it wouldn't work this election as well, do we?

And is it not hypocritical that Red Hacks always talk about LV, when they don't like results? Why did LV screen look good for, when this polls showed C+12?

As I always say: Average and move on. Average every single poll. Or just use 538/Upshot/HuffPost.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #207 on: October 29, 2016, 10:37:02 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Just don't like hypocrisy.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #208 on: October 29, 2016, 10:37:53 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Just don't like hypocrisy.
I see none, just a sad troll who wants to get noticed by people.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #209 on: October 29, 2016, 10:40:10 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Just don't like hypocrisy.
I see none, just a sad troll who wants to get noticed by people.

I see no racism from police against Blacks, just a sad trolls protesting to get interviewed by CNN instead of working hard.

It is ok, when we do it!
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #210 on: October 29, 2016, 10:42:37 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Just don't like hypocrisy.
I see none, just a sad troll who wants to get noticed by people.

I see no racism from police against Blacks, just a sad trolls protesting to get interviewed by CNN instead of working hard.

It is ok, when we do it!
Yep, a troll.  Go off and troll someplace else.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,364
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -4.00


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #211 on: October 29, 2016, 11:00:46 AM »
« Edited: October 29, 2016, 11:02:19 AM by HagridOfTheDeep »

Yeah, so basically what we can conclude from the polls is that no pollster really has a good idea of who's going to turn out, but also that there simply are not enough people willing to vote for Trump to put him over the top unless Hillary voters turn out in numbers lower than their lowest of low projections.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #212 on: October 29, 2016, 11:13:33 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Nate is apparantly is a sad troll as well Cheesy
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/792396374042087424




EDIT: and one more https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/792398796583997441
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #213 on: October 29, 2016, 11:17:58 AM »

It is hilarious that Trumpers Red hacks I see on twitter are now ignoring this so called most accurate poll ever and are pumping up the ABC IBD/Tipp poll now, which a week ago was a complete joke to them.
Agreed.
Why such trolling on your part.  Noting better to do?

Nate is apparantly is a sad troll as well Cheesy
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/792396374042087424




EDIT: and one more https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/792398796583997441
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
The same Nate Silver who didn't trust his data in the primaries, and now is over-correcting for the general?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,515
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #214 on: October 29, 2016, 11:18:35 AM »

Yeah, so basically what we can conclude from the polls is that no pollster really has a good idea of who's going to turn out, but also that there simply are not enough people willing to vote for Trump to put him over the top unless Hillary voters turn out in numbers lower than their lowest of low projections.

yep. In my mind, it's either a small Clinton popular vote win with the slight possibility of a Trump Electoral college win, or a large Clinton popular vote win.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #215 on: October 29, 2016, 11:20:29 AM »

And one more: https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/792399653660655616

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nate Silver is sayint exactly what I've been saying.

Average and move on. But Atlas experts digs deep into each single poll and, even worse, in small subgroups and do "analysis", lol.
Logged
Chocolate Thunder
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,895
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #216 on: October 29, 2016, 11:22:15 AM »

Yeah, so basically what we can conclude from the polls is that no pollster really has a good idea of who's going to turn out, but also that there simply are not enough people willing to vote for Trump to put him over the top unless Hillary voters turn out in numbers lower than their lowest of low projections.

yep. In my mind, it's either a small Clinton popular vote win with the slight possibility of a Trump Electoral college win, or a large Clinton popular vote win.
That's why you vote early. So you don't forget. Smiley
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #217 on: October 29, 2016, 11:23:49 AM »

The same Nate Silver who didn't trust his data in the primaries, and now is over-correcting for the general?
Before the primaries. He gave up directly after Iowa/NH more or less. But it was 16 dudes, and polls are generally pretty unstable there.

But yeah, he was wrong. Though, it has nothing to do with this tweet, has it?
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #218 on: October 29, 2016, 11:26:26 AM »

The same Nate Silver who didn't trust his data in the primaries, and now is over-correcting for the general?
Before the primaries. He gave up directly after Iowa/NH more or less. But it was 16 dudes, and polls are generally pretty unstable there.
But he didn't give up, he kept trying to say he was right, until he made a fool of himself and his site, now he is trying to over-correct the record.
Logged
Hammy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,490
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #219 on: October 29, 2016, 12:21:42 PM »

This poll could mean two very opposite things: either a tightening of the race or, as the poll indicated some Clinton voters felt their vote wasn't needed for Clinton to win, that she could get a bump from the Comey scandal by pushing those people to vote.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #220 on: October 29, 2016, 12:29:25 PM »

This poll could mean two very opposite things: either a tightening of the race or, as the poll indicated some Clinton voters felt their vote wasn't needed for Clinton to win, that she could get a bump from the Comey scandal by pushing those people to vote.
In what way did this poll indicate it?
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,666


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #221 on: October 29, 2016, 12:52:44 PM »

Lol at all this bed wetting.
Logged
JJC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #222 on: October 29, 2016, 01:06:53 PM »

Guys, it's over. Clinton is being trounced right now in early voting for every swing state except Colorado.

Trump was surging even before the reopened FBI investigation. And his supporters are way more energized.

Trump will win.
Logged
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,824
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #223 on: October 29, 2016, 01:08:12 PM »

Guys, it's over. Clinton is being trounced right now in early voting for every swing state except Colorado.

Trump was surging even before the reopened FBI investigation. And his supporters are way more energized.

Trump will win.

Huh I suggest you go look at the early vote thread with actual facts before you spew innuendo.
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,995
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #224 on: October 29, 2016, 01:11:46 PM »

lol
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.081 seconds with 12 queries.