|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 01, 2020, 01:04:22 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  AZ: Arizona Republic: McCain with Large Lead in Arizona
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: AZ: Arizona Republic: McCain with Large Lead in Arizona  (Read 1280 times)
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 3,375
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 19, 2016, 06:58:06 am »

New Poll: Arizona Senator by Arizona Republic on 2016-10-15

Summary: D: 40%, R: 52%, U: 0%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,964
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: 5.30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2016, 08:45:18 am »

This seat is fool's gold for the Dems. Seems like McCain got away with his unendorsement. Likely R.
Logged
Chief Justice windjammer
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,016
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2016, 08:56:59 am »

There is an another poll that shows Mccain +3 only though
Logged
Figueira
84285
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,844


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2016, 09:04:10 am »

We could see a Mark Warner situation here, but I won't hold my breath.
Logged
Trends are real, and I f**king hate it
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 51,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2016, 11:25:02 am »

Yeah, nothing to see here, even though McCain objectively deserves to lose.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,025
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2016, 12:24:14 pm »

Respect to Ann Kirkpatrick for trying. Dems couldn't have found a better candidate. Certainly deserves more credit than Strickland or Murphy.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,317
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2016, 01:03:57 pm »

Respect to Ann Kirkpatrick for trying. Dems couldn't have found a better candidate. Certainly deserves more credit than Strickland or Murphy.

Sinema? Giffords? Carmona?
Logged
Make America Malarkey Free Again
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,322
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2016, 01:08:03 pm »

I guess McCain is just too entrenched. Democrats were right to put forth a decent candidate, since there was a chance that Ward could have beaten McCain in the primary.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,025
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2016, 02:15:14 pm »

Respect to Ann Kirkpatrick for trying. Dems couldn't have found a better candidate. Certainly deserves more credit than Strickland or Murphy.

Sinema? Giffords? Carmona?

Giffords is in no shape to campaign. Sinema and Carmona would probably run equal or worse than Kirkpatrick IMO.
Logged
gf20202
Rookie
**
Posts: 134
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2016, 04:25:49 pm »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,317
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2016, 04:31:56 pm »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2016, 04:34:25 pm »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
CLC, DeSantis, and Jolly would have been fighting a bitter three-way primary, and the winner would come out damaged and short on cash, giving Murphy the advantage (by mid-June, it became clear Murphy would win his primary).
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,317
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2016, 04:36:58 pm »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
CLC, DeSantis, and Jolly would have been fighting a bitter three-way primary, and the winner would come out damaged and short on cash, giving Murphy the advantage (by mid-June, it became clear Murphy would win his primary).

Yeah, but to pretend that Murphy could literally refrain from campaigning and still win (Which is what Safe D is supposed to mean) is just stupid.
Logged
Senator Scott🦠😷
Ascott
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,426
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2016, 11:05:31 pm »
« Edited: October 19, 2016, 11:15:15 pm by Meme Magic »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
CLC, DeSantis, and Jolly would have been fighting a bitter three-way primary, and the winner would come out damaged and short on cash, giving Murphy the advantage (by mid-June, it became clear Murphy would win his primary).

Yeah, but to pretend that Murphy could literally refrain from campaigning and still win (Which is what Safe D is supposed to mean) is just stupid.

So if Rob Portman stops campaigning, he'll lose?

I don't think there are any Congress members who simply 'not campaign' because they have a safe seat.  And frankly if you're someone who doesn't, you're probably a shtty representative for your constituents in general.

Mark Warner and Bob Casey were supposed to be the safest incumbents in their last elections.  Lee Terry was supposed to be safe in his district.  When they took that attitude, they either lost or came reasonably close to losing.
Logged
Fitzgerald
Rookie
**
Posts: 106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2016, 11:10:48 pm »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
CLC, DeSantis, and Jolly would have been fighting a bitter three-way primary, and the winner would come out damaged and short on cash, giving Murphy the advantage (by mid-June, it became clear Murphy would win his primary).

Yeah, but to pretend that Murphy could literally refrain from campaigning and still win (Which is what Safe D is supposed to mean) is just stupid.

I take it back, Wulfric. You do know more about politics than TNvol! Wink
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,317
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2016, 11:49:23 pm »
« Edited: October 19, 2016, 11:54:37 pm by Dwarven Dragon »

Kirkpatrick was never going to beat McCain. She's about as overrated as Murphy and Strickland.
Who ever rated Murphy high enough to be considered overrated?
Ironically, TNVol, who repeatedly rated Murphy vs. CLC, Murphy vs. DeSantis, and Murphy vs. Jolly Safe D.
CLC, DeSantis, and Jolly would have been fighting a bitter three-way primary, and the winner would come out damaged and short on cash, giving Murphy the advantage (by mid-June, it became clear Murphy would win his primary).

Yeah, but to pretend that Murphy could literally refrain from campaigning and still win (Which is what Safe D is supposed to mean) is just stupid.

So if Rob Portman stops campaigning, he'll lose?

No, he'll win. I have that at Safe R now.

And on representatives who don't campaign, let me know when all of those super safe democrats in NYC, or all of those super safe republicans in much of Texas, ever get around to campaigning in the general election. Yeah, they'll do something in the primary if someone runs against them. But in the general, maybe a town hall or two in the August Recess because "everyone does it", but beyond that they probably just sit back in one of their residences and relax while whatever donations they get collect dust in some bank account or random desk drawer, never to be spent until their next primary.
Logged
❤️❤️❤️
omegascarlet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,655


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2016, 09:43:29 pm »

Respect to Ann Kirkpatrick for trying. Dems couldn't have found a better candidate. Certainly deserves more credit than Strickland or Murphy.

Sinema? Giffords? Carmona?

Sinema is an openly bisexual atheist. I'm not sure Arizona would like her(Though she would still probably be a good recruit). Giffords has recovered from the shooting in 2011, but she still has a strongly inhibited ability to speak(i.e. she can think fine, but has serious trouble communicating those thoughts), which would make voters unfairly question her mental ability. Carmona doesn't want to run anymore, so...
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,317
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2016, 07:47:06 pm »

Respect to Ann Kirkpatrick for trying. Dems couldn't have found a better candidate. Certainly deserves more credit than Strickland or Murphy.

Sinema? Giffords? Carmona?

Sinema is an openly bisexual atheist. I'm not sure Arizona would like her(Though she would still probably be a good recruit). Giffords has recovered from the shooting in 2011, but she still has a strongly inhibited ability to speak(i.e. she can think fine, but has serious trouble communicating those thoughts), which would make voters unfairly question her mental ability. Carmona doesn't want to run anymore, so...

Did Sinema ever actually classify herself as athiest? I know she dodged the question at least once in 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines