Worst Democratic President (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 05:01:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Worst Democratic President (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Wilson
 
#2
FDR
 
#3
Truman
 
#4
Kennedy
 
#5
LBJ
 
#6
Carter
 
#7
Clinton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Author Topic: Worst Democratic President  (Read 16851 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« on: April 25, 2004, 08:28:12 AM »
« edited: September 18, 2005, 01:28:52 PM by Boss Tweed »

LBJ, by far.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2004, 03:43:29 PM »


of the twentieth century
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2004, 02:42:05 PM »

How could anyone vote for Carter over LBJ?

Did Carter murder 60k Americans and countless Vietnamese?

My thoughts exactly

LBJ was the worst foreign policy president EVER, not even close.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2004, 02:36:24 PM »

Polk and Reagan were also murderers
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2005, 01:29:45 PM »

I re-posted the poll at the top of the first post here that used to exist before the massacre that messed up all the data tables and polls.  So now we can all vote in the poll.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2005, 02:22:43 PM »

Of those listed, Wilson. Clinton a close second. But they were all better than most 19th century Democrat presidents. Though not necessarily better men. (Going by personal character rather than presidency, imy vote goes to Kennedy btw.)

Why Clinton?  Because peace and prosperity are so bad?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2005, 02:26:28 PM »

Of those listed, Wilson. Clinton a close second. But they were all better than most 19th century Democrat presidents. Though not necessarily better men. (Going by personal character rather than presidency, imy vote goes to Kennedy btw.)

Why Clinton?  Because peace and prosperity are so bad?
Peace? In the 90s? Where? Prosperity off stolen goods.

NAFTA is stealing goods?  Otherwise I don't know what you mean.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2005, 02:32:36 PM »

I understand.  You want to end free trade and hinder the first world economies on the basis of unethical exploitation of third world labor and goods.  I don't believe we should hurt our economies to potentially acheive a better life for Kim-Yang in a sweatshop in Laos--but that's just me.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2005, 02:41:44 PM »

I find it admirable that you care more about others that you will never meet half-a-world away, but I feel differently.  I'd rahter have my money (as would the majority of first-world residents).

Honestly, I do find it admirable, I'm not being sarcastic.  It's kind of like the vegetarians who refuse to eat meat because they don't want animals killed.

But we're getting off topic.  Good luck to you, Lewis.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.