Fox: NV - Heck + 7 NC - Burr + 6 Portman + 14
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 04, 2022, 03:09:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  Fox: NV - Heck + 7 NC - Burr + 6 Portman + 14
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fox: NV - Heck + 7 NC - Burr + 6 Portman + 14  (Read 1628 times)
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,308
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2016, 05:07:53 PM »
« edited: September 21, 2016, 05:10:24 PM by Representative dfwlibertylover »

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/21/fox-news-poll-trump-tops-clinton-in-battlegrounds-nevada-n-carolina-ohio.html

Nevada:
Heck - 43
Cortez Masto - 36

North Carolina:
Burr - 43
Ross - 37

Ohio:
Portman - 51
Stickland - 37
Logged
15 Down, 35 To Go
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,427


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2016, 05:15:54 PM »

Does anyone agree with me that Nevada's Senate race is Lean R at this point?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2016, 05:18:01 PM »

These polls are definitely R-friendly.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,106
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2016, 05:21:28 PM »

Lol
Logged
Lincoln Speaker Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,287
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2016, 05:22:07 PM »

Certainly disagrees with the consensus on NC. Interesting.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,106
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2016, 05:26:25 PM »

Certainly disagrees with the consensus on NC. Interesting.
I agree that the NC numbers seem off, but when comparing the margins it still agrees with the consensus. McCrory underperformed Trump by 2, while Burr overperforms Trump by 1. I think that is about right, but I think McCrory is down by 3, Trump tied and Burr +1 is more like it.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,380
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: -1.57

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2016, 05:41:01 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,232
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2016, 05:59:20 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.

Heck is about as good a candidate they could have found, barring Sandoval entering and making it Safe R.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2016, 06:04:15 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.

Heck is about as good a candidate they could have found, barring Sandoval entering and making it Safe R.
Outside of Sandoval he is the only candidate who has any appeal in Clark County,  he is also helped by the fact that Cortez Masto, while not a bad candidate, is fairly anonymous
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,232
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2016, 06:08:24 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.

Heck is about as good a candidate they could have found, barring Sandoval entering and making it Safe R.
Outside of Sandoval he is the only candidate who has any appeal in Clark County,  he is also helped by the fact that Cortez Masto, while not a bad candidate, is fairly anonymous

Plus it's not like Democrats had many better options
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2016, 06:10:43 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.

Heck is about as good a candidate they could have found, barring Sandoval entering and making it Safe R.
Outside of Sandoval he is the only candidate who has any appeal in Clark County,  he is also helped by the fact that Cortez Masto, while not a bad candidate, is fairly anonymous

Plus it's not like Democrats had many better options
Ross Miller and Dina Titus were really the only two other heavy hitters they had
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,106
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2016, 06:18:16 PM »

Something interesting is happen in Nevada this election. I have a hard time believing that it is this pro-Republican.

Heck is about as good a candidate they could have found, barring Sandoval entering and making it Safe R.
Outside of Sandoval he is the only candidate who has any appeal in Clark County,  he is also helped by the fact that Cortez Masto, while not a bad candidate, is fairly anonymous

Plus it's not like Democrats had many better options
Ross Miller and Dina Titus were really the only two other heavy hitters they had
Cortez Masto also, while AG, was under fire for indicting then-LG Brian Krolicki, then dropping the indictment (which was purely partisan motivated) since he had done no wrongdoing. Ross lost the AG race in 2014, though the wave really hurt him. Titus also lost to Heck in 2010, and would not have been that much better. The Democratic bench in Nevada is pretty weak, for now.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,549
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2016, 06:22:19 PM »

Sorry, these numbers aren't happening.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,308
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2016, 06:31:08 PM »

What the HECK are you talking about? hehe
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,549
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2016, 06:38:08 PM »


That was a sick BURR right there...

Okay, I'll show myself to the door.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,006
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2016, 06:43:19 PM »

This seems about right for Portman. Heck is probably up by 3 and so is burr overall though.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2016, 06:48:18 PM »

The OH and NC numbers make sense given their presidential numbers. NV is a bit weird, but could be accurate.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,557
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2016, 07:13:21 PM »

Seems pretty clear right now that all three are up, but none of them are up by those margins. With Burr and Portman it makes sense considering the lean of the year and their states and the campaigns that have been waged.

After the Angle/Reid race in 2010, I'm loathe to call anything for Nevada Republicans until the votes come in, but it seems pretty clear the lead Heck has is at least stronger than the lead Angle had; no poll after June had her up by more than 4. (If any of you don't recall, the final average had her up 3, and Reid won by 6, so if you think the error will be similar this is no proof that Heck is winning. In 2012, on the contrary, the final average had Heller up by 4 and he won by 1; in that case, on the other hand, only one poll, a rogue September PPP, had Berkley up during the entire calendar year 2012, though there were multiple ties).

At the moment, including this poll but weirdly not including the recent PPP, RCP has Heck up 3. If the error is similar to 2012, this race is an exact tie. If it is similar to 2010, then Masto is up 6, though that seems doubtful. (In the 2014-Gov race, on the other hand, the average had Sandoval up by 25 but he won by 47; if that repeats, Heck will win by 25 points Tongue). This is exactly what makes Nevada so damn frustrating.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,809


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2016, 07:27:46 PM »

CCM is not a bad candidate at all, I guess her sin is not being a more high profile AG. She was elected statewide twice by decent margins and her name ID is pretty terrible.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,477
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2016, 08:11:43 PM »

wow Heck still can't get above 45% or so! Embarassing!

And it's amazing that Burr is doing WORSE than Heck.

Obviously Ohio is a lost cause but i mean jesus dems.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,000
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2016, 09:51:59 PM »

Obvious outliers for both the Senate and Presidential numbers.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,571
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2016, 03:46:27 AM »

wow Heck still can't get above 45% or so! Embarassing!

And it's amazing that Burr is doing WORSE than Heck.

Obviously Ohio is a lost cause but i mean jesus dems.
And Cortez-Masto that still can't get around 40% isn't a bit embarassing? Roll Eyes
Logged
Mr.Barkari Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 70,154
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2016, 04:24:01 AM »

I hope Cortez-Masto wins, Berkeley was unstated too and she lost due to scandal. But Heck isnt up by 7, it's still a margin of error race. Due to Latinos
Logged
RRusso1982
Rookie
**
Posts: 189
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2016, 02:33:48 PM »

Democrats have a history of outperforming the polls in Nevada.  In 2004, most polls had Bush comfortably winning Nevada.  He barely won it.  In 2010, the polls almost all had Angle ahead of Reid by a few.  Reid won by 5.  In 2012, the polls all had Heller winning by a decent margin.  He barely squeaked by. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 15 queries.