MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:21:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way  (Read 4315 times)
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2016, 12:49:50 PM »

All things considered, MULaw Poll has been rather consistent since June:

Among Reg voters, Clinton up 7, 7, 10, 5, 5. Wisconsin, it would seem, is not really all that elastic. Not surprising given our polarization.

Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2016, 12:54:40 PM »

lol everyone stop being Beet. Hillary will win WI by 9 or 10 points.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2016, 12:58:34 PM »

1.Trump has never led in a WI poll. At this point in 2012 Romney had already led in WI, including in a poll by PPP.
2.Those undecideds will break heavily for Hillary, this is one of the few "swing" states where she has hit 50% on more than one occasion. MU had her at 52-37% among LV after the DNC. Trump will never win WI.

you mean august,2012 poll
PPP (D)   8/16 - 8/19   1308 LV   2.7   Obama 47 Romney 48   Romney +1

Romney did worse at mid-late september,2012
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/wi/wisconsin_romney_vs_obama-1871.html#polls

Marquette University   9/27 - 9/30   894 LV   Obama 53   Romney 42   Obama +11
WeAskAmerica                  9/20 - 9/23   1238LV     Obama 53   Romney 41   Obama +12
PPP (D)                           9/18 - 9/19   842 LV      Obama 52   Romney 45   Obama +7
NBC/WSJ/Marist              9/16 - 9/18   968 LV    Obama 50   Romney 45   Obama +5
 
Plus, Romney had turnouts problem.
Now Hillary has, less than 200 people in Philly rally.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/19/photo-donald-trump-draws-massive-crowd-far-more-than-hillary-clinton-in-florida/



LOL, it was Romney who got the big crowds in 2012. You just disproved your own point.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2016, 01:12:08 PM »

lol everyone stop being Beet. Hillary will win WI by 9 or 10 points.

I'm not sure it'll be by that much, especially if the race remains this tight, but I'm confident WI will go for Hillary in close race.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2016, 01:16:35 PM »

Obama's approval is +13 here.
Logged
Absolution9
Rookie
**
Posts: 172


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2016, 01:17:41 PM »

1.Trump has never led in a WI poll. At this point in 2012 Romney had already led in WI, including in a poll by PPP.
2.Those undecideds will break heavily for Hillary, this is one of the few "swing" states where she has hit 50% on more than one occasion. MU had her at 52-37% among LV after the DNC. Trump will never win WI.

you mean august,2012 poll
PPP (D)   8/16 - 8/19   1308 LV   2.7   Obama 47 Romney 48   Romney +1

Romney did worse at mid-late september,2012


Marquette University   9/27 - 9/30   894 LV   Obama 53   Romney 42   Obama +11
WeAskAmerica                  9/20 - 9/23   1238LV     Obama 53   Romney 41   Obama +12
PPP (D)                           9/18 - 9/19   842 LV      Obama 52   Romney 45   Obama +7
NBC/WSJ/Marist              9/16 - 9/18   968 LV    Obama 50   Romney 45   Obama +5
 
Plus, Romney had turnouts problem.
Now Hillary has, less than 200 people in Philly rally.




LOL, it was Romney who got the big crowds in 2012. You just disproved your own point.

Romney got big crowds in October right before the election but Obama was also getting huge crowds throughout.  I remember he had a 15k+ crowd in Ohio and a 10K crowd in VA all the way back in May 2012.

It was only in the last month that Romney caught up in crowd size.  Maybe Clinton will as well although I doubt it.  Having big crowds and enthusiasm is an advantage but difficult to say how much especially if it is like Trump's support.  He has 15-20M people that are very enthusiastic but most others aren't.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2016, 01:40:23 PM »

Not bad for Trump. Probably the most likely FREIWAL state to go for Trump.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,489
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 21, 2016, 01:42:33 PM »

She should send Bernie here instead of Ohio.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 21, 2016, 01:51:22 PM »

Trump won't win Wisconsin. Outside of the WoW area, he's an absolute horrible fit for the state.

The GB area is heavily Catholic and adverse to anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The MKE area has heavy minority populations that will swing hard against him.
He's absolutely hated in Dane County.
The MN twin cities exurbs of the northeast are likely to reject him as well.

His best areas will be the WoW counties and, possibly, parts of the central northern areas of the state. Undecideds will break heavily against him, and Feingold is actually doing the work of energizing turnout because people want him back in the seat he shouldn't have lost.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 21, 2016, 01:52:32 PM »

She should send Bernie here instead of Ohio.

Unless their polling shows otherwise. Clinton hasn't been in WI since April, I have to imagine that's intentional.

Agree that Bernie would be good here (same with Obama).
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 21, 2016, 01:53:51 PM »

Trump won't win Wisconsin. Outside of the WoW area, he's an absolute horrible fit for the state.

The GB area is heavily Catholic and adverse to anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The MKE area has heavy minority populations that will swing hard against him.
He's absolutely hated in Dane County.
The MN twin cities exurbs of the northeast are likely to reject him as well.

His best areas will be the WoW counties and, possibly, parts of the central northern areas of the state. Undecideds will break heavily against him, and Feingold is actually doing the work of energizing turnout because people want him back in the seat he shouldn't have lost.

What's your thought on final margin?
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 21, 2016, 01:58:32 PM »

It's also worth mentioning that Wisconsin usually has among the highest turnout rates in the nation... RV polls are more valuable here, since nearly everyone who is registered, ends up voting.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,169
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 21, 2016, 03:20:25 PM »

Good. This means that if Hillary can regain some ground here, Feingold should be safe.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 21, 2016, 03:21:58 PM »

Good. This means that if Hillary can regain some ground here, Feingold should be safe.
On the Presidential level, Wisconsin is competitive. But I'm now convinced that Johnson actually under performs Trump.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 21, 2016, 03:25:31 PM »

Trump won't win Wisconsin. Outside of the WoW area, he's an absolute horrible fit for the state.

The GB area is heavily Catholic and adverse to anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The MKE area has heavy minority populations that will swing hard against him.
He's absolutely hated in Dane County.
The MN twin cities exurbs of the northeast are likely to reject him as well.

His best areas will be the WoW counties and, possibly, parts of the central northern areas of the state. Undecideds will break heavily against him, and Feingold is actually doing the work of energizing turnout because people want him back in the seat he shouldn't have lost.

What's your thought on final margin?

If things pan out as we're expecting, the margin will be somewhere between 2012 and 2008, about Clinton +9 with some GB area and MN exurb counties flipping.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: September 21, 2016, 03:27:12 PM »

Good. This means that if Hillary can regain some ground here, Feingold should be safe.
On the Presidential level, Wisconsin is competitive. But I'm now convinced that Johnson actually under performs Trump.

TBH, I'd say its more accurate that Feingold exceeds Hillary.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: September 21, 2016, 03:36:28 PM »

Trump won't win Wisconsin. Outside of the WoW area, he's an absolute horrible fit for the state.

The GB area is heavily Catholic and adverse to anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The MKE area has heavy minority populations that will swing hard against him.
He's absolutely hated in Dane County.
The MN twin cities exurbs of the northeast are likely to reject him as well.

His best areas will be the WoW counties and, possibly, parts of the central northern areas of the state. Undecideds will break heavily against him, and Feingold is actually doing the work of energizing turnout because people want him back in the seat he shouldn't have lost.

What's your thought on final margin?

If things pan out as we're expecting, the margin will be somewhere between 2012 and 2008, about Clinton +9 with some GB area and MN exurb counties flipping.

Trump is up 8% in the Green Bay/Appelton media market and he has been for at least the last 3 polls.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: September 21, 2016, 03:57:34 PM »

Trump won't win Wisconsin. Outside of the WoW area, he's an absolute horrible fit for the state.

The GB area is heavily Catholic and adverse to anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The MKE area has heavy minority populations that will swing hard against him.
He's absolutely hated in Dane County.
The MN twin cities exurbs of the northeast are likely to reject him as well.

His best areas will be the WoW counties and, possibly, parts of the central northern areas of the state. Undecideds will break heavily against him, and Feingold is actually doing the work of energizing turnout because people want him back in the seat he shouldn't have lost.

What's your thought on final margin?

If things pan out as we're expecting, the margin will be somewhere between 2012 and 2008, about Clinton +9 with some GB area and MN exurb counties flipping.

Trump is up 8% in the Green Bay/Appelton media market and he has been for at least the last 3 polls.

Some counties, not most or all.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: September 21, 2016, 05:27:18 PM »

Meanwhile Feingold is doing just fine ahead 47/41, Obama JA 54/41. Hmm I wonder how we'd be doing with a different candidate?
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,392
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: September 21, 2016, 05:30:38 PM »

If Obama's approval ratings are consistently 10 points above water or more, she has no excuse for losing here.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: September 21, 2016, 05:43:16 PM »

One positive is that Trump's numbers still haven't budged an inch.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,450
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: September 21, 2016, 05:49:39 PM »

This is undoubtedly Trump's best poll of the day...

Although some of our knowledgeable posters have presented cases as to why Trump is unlikely to take the football over the line in WI, considering the composition of 3rd Party and undecided voters, Obama approval ratings, etc.... Wisconsin pretty much looks like the only state that can take Trump over 270, even with wins in FL,OH,NC,IA, and NV.

Trump is clearly performing much better in the industrial Midwest than in many other regions, and even fairly solid Democratic states in the upper-midwest (WI and MI) are much closer than one might imagine.

PA looks to be a solid Clinton lock, even in her worst polling weeks, NH appears to be totally off-the-board.

I don't see VA or CO going Trump this year, despite a few polls from those states in the past week from dubious sources that indicate that the race has tightened in those two respective states.

#Battleground WI for the Trump win.

Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: September 21, 2016, 05:59:04 PM »


Then he has already lost.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: September 21, 2016, 06:13:02 PM »


I mean, it's pretty clear NV, NC and FL are going to vote to the right of WI (maybe not the last one), which would mean he needs one of WI, CO, and NH (or MI or PA, lol). It's not a must-win when you have arguably two other options, but he won't win any of them, so it's OK.
Logged
EpicHistory
Rookie
**
Posts: 233
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: September 21, 2016, 06:51:20 PM »

Not bad for Trump. Probably the most likely FREIWAL state to go for Trump.

Florida + Ohio + Iowa + ME-02+ Nevada + Romney 206 + Wisconsin = 276.

Basically he needs to avoid anymore gaffes plus go all in for WI and FL. If he can lock them down and stay focused, he's got this.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 13 queries.